学年

教科

質問の種類

英語 高校生

6の5行目until〜 このuntilってコンマの前にあるからコンマの前の文に含まれるんじゃないんですか? なぜ後の文に含まれるんですか? あと訳〜までずっとだと思うんですけどそんな訳なくて、どういう働きしてるんですか?これ

ESH CASE kno we c Per sp abo und feal Wo 10 per a C doo ar be gr 151 語句 recent [形] 最近の/biology 名 生物学/pioneer 名 先駆者/ parallel compu 並列計算 (複数の計算装置が協力して1つの処理を行うこと)/quantum computing 計算/3 in fact 事実、 実際/ remarkable 形 非凡な, 目立った/consider OCO をC hide 圃隠す/trick 秘訣 優れた技術 / insist on -ing 〜するといって譲らない なす, 考える/magician 名 魔術師/* be content to 原形 〜することにしてい introductory class 入門クラス / undergraduate 名 学部生 / exceedingly 非常に rare for ~ ~ では [としては]珍しい/academic 名 学者/ironic 形 皮肉っぽい/S of humor ユーモアのセンス/practical 形 実際に役立つ, 実践的な / everyday By 普通の/term 圈 専門用語, 言葉 / favorite 人気者 文法・構文 '<A + 名詞> は具体例の目印です (Rule 8 p.89)。 今回も、 「才能だけでな コミュニケーション力も大切」という主張の具体例として Richard Feynmanが挙げ れています。 21つ目のandは、過去形の動詞2つ (madeとwas) を結んでいます。 文と合わせて not A. {But} B. 「AでなくB」 から 「But が消える」パターンです。 s' ht 0 1かつてショーペンハウ 天才は他の誰にも見えない的 たちにも的を見てほしいと望 1 talent 名 (単数・複数 6' (Perhaps) the best example of 〈how Feynman combined brilliance w exceptional communication skills) was a talk [he gave a few days (afte 限定の副詞 Christmas) (in 1959)]. 2 (Starting from a basic question [about (what would take 真 s 飯 to shrink the Encyclopedia Britannica (to fit on the head of a pin)〉]), he moved (step by step) (until (in less than an hour), he ha invented the field of nanotechnology). witch.on. ozleitud (2aer gi sv しいと思う R ファインマンがどのように優れた才能と並外れたコミュニケーション能力を組み 合わせたかを示すのに最もよい例はおそらく, 1959年のクリスマス数日後に彼が行った 講演だろう。 ブリタニカ百科事典を圧縮して針の先端程度の面積に収めるにはどうする 必要があるだろうかという基本的な問題から始まって, 彼は段階を追って話を進め, 1時 間もしないうちにナノテクノロジーという領域を発案してしまったのである。 1 文法・構文 1We tend to treat km 2We act (as if havin Icombine A with BAとBを組み合わせる/brilliance 名 抜群の才能,才気/ exceptional 形並外れた / shrink 圧縮する / Encyclopedia Britannica ブリタニカ百 科事典/fit ぴたりと収まる / step by step 段階を追って / invent 発明する、考え出 す / nanotechnology ナノテクノロジー 2 through quiet study)). 文法・構文 'a few days は after Christmas 「クリスマスのあと」の範囲を限定していて、 「ク ( esinebut リスマスの数日後」 という意味になります。 take 名詞 to 原形〉「~するには名詞が必要である」で、「名詞がwhat になり前に出た形 what it would take to ~ は、 本来 〈it would です(間接疑問) to the realm of the s species)]. Yet, (as 77 'Schopenhauer (once) said (that, "talent hits a target [no one else can hit 中] Genius hits a target no one else can see off. 2Feynman was a genius v' [who wanted us to see it too]. V logically) unsound ( (to ourselves) (in a anything [that we knowledge, but 訳 an 私たちは知識 私たちは、専門的なス るものであるかのよ 人間と交流するため」 ュタインが何十年か ュニケーションをと 私たちは,自分か 知識を持つこ さないのである。 語句 ' tend to 域 / 2 act as if S ある, 手に入れる/ ~と交流する/ private langua 主張する/ 文法・構文 2 係なく were す。 our s いた the spe

解決済み 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

黄色線のhis business が 干渉しないよう という意味になるんですか😵‍💫

3,000 animated characters. 2 Blanc was born on May 30, 1908, in San Francisco, California. However, when he was a child, his family moved to Portland, Oregon, where he attended 問1の正解の根拠 ~へ引っ越した 〜に通った school. When he was young, a game he used to play by himself was to look at, よくしたものだ 一人で for example, a bird, and try to imagine what it would sound like if it could talk. Then, he would try to make the voice that he had imagined. 問1の正解の根拠 ~を集めた 問1の正解の根拠 3 In 1927, Blanc began working for a daily radio program. There, because the sponsors could not afford to hire more actors, Blanc used his own voice for many of the show's characters. After that, he moved to Los Angeles, California, where he joined Leon Schlesinger Productions, an animation studio that had assembled some of the greatest voice actors of the time. This company did the work for Warner Brothers, which developed the cartoons that made Blanc rotair lo subiq soloqu na diw envoys abiyong liw 4 Without a doubt, Blanc's most famous voice is that of Bugs Bunny, the star of the Warner Brothers animated line-up since 1940. Blanc not only provided Bugs Bunny a voice, but also a personality and his famous catch-phrase, "What's up, doc?" The team involved in creating Bugs was very careful about famous. 〜に関わった 問3の正解の根拠 giving him a personality that would be popular for everyone. They decided that Bugs would not be an unkind character; he would just always be peacefully minding his business until someone started trying to hurt him or make him do something he did not want to do. Then, he would fight back. Blanc was very JAKE 問3の正解の根拠 proud of Bugs and thought that the character could be a role model. He said, "Bugs does what most people would like to do but don't have the guts to do." 問2の正解の根拠 5 By the 1940s, Blanc was providing the voices for more than 90 percent of the Warner Brothers cartoon characters. To put that in perspective, from 1940 to 1959, Warner Brothers released almost provided about 540 voices during that time. それを総体的に見ると 600 cartoons. That means Blanc Through this time Blanc appeared on many radio and television programs. He provided the voices for the most 問1の正解の根拠 lovable side characters on extremely popular programs of those days. Then, in the 1960s, he voiced some of the characters in "The Flintstones," the first -126- 生 H

解決済み 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

投げやりです。すいません。英語皆無なので代行してください。

【必答問題 5 日常使う物のデザインをする際には標準化 (standardization) という方法がある。 という内容に続く次の英文を読んで、あとの問いに答えよ。(配点44) If we examine the history of advances in all technological fields, we see that some improvements come naturally through the technology itself, while others come through standardization. The early history of the automobile is a good example. The first cars were very difficult to operate. They required strength and skill beyond the abilities of many. Some problems were solved through automation. Other aspects of cars and driving were standardized through the long process of international standards committees: . On which side of the road to drive (constant within countries) country, but variable across On which side f the car the driver sits (depends upon which side of the road the car is driven) -The (2) of essential components: steering wheel, brake, clutch, and accelerator (the same, whether on the left- or right-hand side of the car) Standardization is one type of cultural constraint. With standardization, once you have learned to drive one car, you feel confident that you can drive any car, anyplace in the world. Standardization provides a major breakthrough in usability. I have enough friends on national and international standards committees to realize that the process f determining an internationally accepted standard is laborious. Even when all members agree on the merits of standardization, the task of selecting standards becomes a long, political issue. A small company can standardize its products without too much difficulty, but it is much more difficult for an industrial, national, or international body to agree to standards. There even exists a standardized procedure for establishing national and international standards. organizations works on standards. First, a set of national and international Then when a new standard is proposed, it must work its way through each organization's approval process. Standards are usually the result of a *compromise among the various competing positions, which can often be an inferior compromise. Sometimes the answer is to agree on (4 ). Look at the existence I both metric and *English units; of left-hand- and 18 right-hand-drive automobiles. There are several international standards for the *voltages and *frequencies of electricity, and several different kinds of electrical plugs and sockets- which cannot interchanged. With all these difficulties and with the continual advances in technology, are standards really necessary? Yes, they are. Take the everyday, clock. It's standardized. Consider how much trouble you would have telling time with a backward clock, where the hands revolved "counterclockwise." A few such clocks exist, primarily as humorous conversation pieces. When a clock truly violates standards, such as (the one in Figure 1, it is difficult to determine what time is being displayed. Why? The logic behind the time display is identical to that of conventional clocks: there are only two differences - the hands move in the opposite direction (counterclockwise) and the location of "12," usually at the top, has been moved. This clock is just as logical as the standard one. It. bothers us because we have standardized on a different scheme, on the very definition of the term clockwise. Without such standardization, clock reading would be more difficult: you'd always have to figure out the "mapping. E) compromise *metric メートル法の *English units イギリスの計量法(ヤードボンド法) *frequencies of electricity 電気の周波数 voltages E *mapping 対応づけ (2つのものの間の関係を意味する専門用語) 問1 下線部(1)の内容を、 同じ段落の自動車の例に基づいて30字以内の日本語で答えよ。た だし、句読点も字数に数える。 問2 本文中の空所 (2) に入る語として最も適当なものを、次のア~エのうちから一つ 選び 記号で答えよ。 7 color イ location ウ price I sight (239) 問3 第2パラグラフ (Standardization is one type of ...) について 次の Question に対す る Answer となるように、空所に入れるのに最も適当なものを,次のア~エのうちから一 つ選び、 記号で答えよ。 Question: What is "a major breakthrough in usability" provided by standardization? Answer Because of standardization, you ( device of the same kind all over the world. 7 can apply what you have learned to イ can make cannot produce I cannot use what you have learned when using 問7 下線部(5)が表す図 (Figure 1)として最も適当なものを、次のア~エのうちから一つ選 び記号で答えよ。 11 12 1 12 ) any machine or 10 2 10% 9 3 1 5 6 問4 下線部(3)の示す内容を, 40字程度の日本語で答えよ。 ただし, 句読点も字数に数える。 ウ 11 6 1 問5 次の文を第3パラグラフ (Ihave enough friends...) に入れるとき,本文中の①~ のうちのどの位置に入れるのが最も適当か、 次のア~エのうちから一つ選び, 記号 で答えよ。 9 3 Each step is complex, for if there are three ways of doing something, then there are sure to be strong proponents of each of the three ways, plus people who will argue that it is too early to standardize. 70 問8 最終パラグラフ (With all these difficulties...) の内容をもとに, 次の Question に2 語程度の英語一文で答えよ。 Question: According to the writer, why is the standardization of the everyday clo necessary? イ 2 ウ H O 問6 本文中の空所 (4) に入れるのに最も適当なものを、次のア~エのうちから一つ選び 記号で答えよ。 7 a single standard 1 several different standards ウ the same standard I too few standards <<-20-> <-21->

回答募集中 回答数: 0
1/7