間違っている下線部がどれなのかわかる方教えていただきたいです。

(1) Although numerous attempts to solve the complex equation, the (2) mathematician struggled to find a viable solution. (3) (4)

赤い下線のところがどういう構造になっているか分からないです、教えてくださいm(_ _)m

moving from " (1) 点) There are historians and others who would like to make a neat division between "historical facts" and "values." The trouble is that values even enter into deciding what count as facts-there is a big leap involved in 'raw data" to a judgement of fact. More important, one finds that the more complex and multi-levelled the history is, and the more important the issues it raises for today, the less it is possible to sustain a fact-value division. But this by no means implies that there has simply to be a conflict of prejudices and biases, as the data are manipulated to suit one worldview or another. What it does mean is that the self of the historian is an important factor. The historian is shaped by experiences, contexts, norms, values, and beliefs. When dealing with history, especially the sort of history that is of most significance in philosophy, that shaping is bound to be relevant. As far as possible it needs to be articulated and open to discussion. The best historians are well aware of this. They are alert to many dimensions of bias and to the endless (and therefore endlessly discussable) significance of their own horizons and presuppositions. A great deal can of course be learned from those who do not share our presuppositions. Our capacity to make wise, well-supported judgements in matters of historical fact and significance can only be formed over years of discussion with others, many of whom have very different horizons from our own. It is possible to I have a 12-year-old chess champion or mathematical or musical genius, but it is unimaginable that the world's greatest expert on Socrates could be that age. The difficulty is not just one of the time to assimilate information; it is (2)

左上の文で、orが繋いでいるのはa problemとwishesだと思ったのですが、正解はhasとwishesでした。なぜ前者の方ではダメなのですか？

⑩ 従属節は[]に入れて構造をつかめ 次の英文の下線部を訳しなさい The Western way of thinking is analytical. If a Westerner has a problem, or wishes to discuss a complex subject, he tries to analyse it. He tries to break the problem or the subject down into separate parts. putoinmos alumin しかし、 ① に if をつけて② に接続させ, 元の文に戻すと [If 〜] の部分は「もし~ なら」という条件を示す副詞 (主に動詞を修飾)の性格を持ちます。 このように副詞の 役割を持つ節を「副詞節」と言いますが, if がついたために,これ自体では独立した 文とは言えなくなってしまいましたね。いわば副詞に格下げされた節なので 「従属節」 と呼び,②は文として独立可能ですから 「主節」 と言います。 この「主節」と「従属 「節」の関係を図示すると,以下の3つのタイプになります。 toriita (1) [接続詞 + S + V + X], S + V + X. 例題のタイプ mogl (2) S+V+ X [接続詞 + S + V + X] . (桜美林大) 解 「節」――よく耳にする言葉ですね。 節は文の一部としてまとまった意味を表 法 それ自体の中に 「SV」 を含む単位を言うのでしたね。and, but, or, nor, for, so などを等位接続詞と呼び, その前後の節 (SVX) を等位節と言います。 SVX (等位節) / and SVX (等位節) 後、第2文 等位接続詞の前でピリオドを打つと,それぞれ独立した文になります。 一方, when, if, as, because, though などのほとんどの接続詞を従属接続詞と言いますが,な ぜ 「従属」と言うのでしょうか。 例題の下線部, 第2文で考えてみましょう。 [If a Westerner (接) もし~なら 西洋人が を持つある 問題 has a problem, S Vt 1 ~したいと思う or wishes について話し合う 複雑なテーマ <別文金) (to discuss a complex subject)], Vt 2 → (不) (Vt) (3) S+V, [接続詞 + S + V + X], X. S, [接続詞 + S + V + X], V + X. 「副詞」の性質から (3) のように,時には主節の中に割り込むタイプもあります。 こ の課のテーマは,このように副詞節を[ ]でくくり、主節と区別して修飾関係を つかむことです。 従属節 If ~ subject を [ ]でくくると,副詞としての文の一部になり, 主節の述 部を修飾していることがわかりますね。 第1文, 第3文については,従来通り前置詞句を( )でくくり, SV を決めて けば、簡単に文の骨格がつかめるはずです。 《全文訳〉 西洋の考え方は,分析的である。 もし西洋人がある問題を抱えたり, 複雑なテーマについて話し合いたいと思う場合は, (西洋人は) それを分析しよう とするのである。 その問題や課題を個々の部分に分解しようと努めるのである。 西洋人は~しようとする を分析しそれ he tries (to analyse it). S Vt 0 (不) (Vt) (0) 演習 10 次の英文の下線部を訳しなさい。 (解説・解答 別冊: p.6) [If ~ ] の部分からIf を除いてみましょう。 bans ai burois quibrell A Westerner has subject. (①) shioinobomeA となり, SVをそなえた独立した文ですね。一方, カンマ以下も独立した文です。 He tries to analyse it. (②) ニアークすると出産しない bran 分析する / break O down into N 「OをNに分解する 」 例題:語句 analytical 形分析的な/a complex subject 複雑なテーマ/ analyse [Vt] を When I speak of internationalization, I do not mean the changing of external life styles but the development of internal new attitudes. Our motivations must be in step with the conditions of the time. (大手前女子短大) 演習:語句 internationalization 图 国際化 / external 形外面上の/ internal 内面的 な / attitude 態度/motivation 動機づけ / in step with N 「Nと調和して」

左の英文の4行目に書いてある、no more or lessのところについてで、3枚目の写真ではno moreはonlyと同じ意味になると書いてあるのですが、no moreには2つ意味があるということですか？

目標時間 2分6秒 音声 What makes us specifically human? The complexity of our language? Our problem-solving strategies? You may be shocked by my suggestion that, in some very deep sense, language and some aspects of human problem solving are no more or less complex than the behaviors of other species. Complexity as such is not the issue. about

thatの範囲がformsまでなのですが、カンマがあるのでthingまでではないのでしょうか？訳がおかしくなるからとういう理由ではない理由があらのでしょうか？よろしくお願いします🙇‍♀️

分詞構文の用法確認 ⑦ 55 名詞+ (Ving は独立分詞構文の可能性 There is growing recognition [that the family is V S S' V' a diverse and complex thing, <the traditional family C' being only one of its forms>]. CD 2-31

英検準一級のライティングです。 添削をお願いしたいです🙇‍♀️

Sould businesses provide more online service? Nowadays, aging Society is a complex and Controversial issue that has both positive and negative effects on society. In my opinion, providing more online survice TS a positive force for the following two reasons. Firstly, to make more confortable world is a top priority providing more online survice Contributes fo help elderly people to buy something, and as a result it will enhance the life. t Through this experience, We quality o of Can learn more about Gastarinable world, and consequently we boaden our horizens. 83 can Secondly, protecting the environment is Critical factors a In fact it is said that Japan is falling behind other countries in the developping online it is possible that environmental improvement our lives However, will make provided, that the financial more Coafortable Survice, that the government puts more resources into promoting more online service. no doubt Given the reasons above, there is that providing more online service is good. for our World 153 100.

9がなぜbetterなのか教えて頂きたいです moreとは何が違うのですか？

plore the problem, the ( 8. 冷静に対応すればするほど、 複雑な状況でもうまくいきます。 The more ( situations. more > you get to the core. calmly) ) you respond, the more ( successfully ) you handle complex 9. 自分の感情をコントロールできればできるほど、 良い人間関係が築けます。 The ( build. more bettokyou you manage your emotions, the ( better relationships you 10

初めの文のthat節内の構文がとれなくて困ってます。どうか教えてください🙇

Consider, for example, that the existence of a single human thought requires the highly complex interaction of hundreds of thousands of neurons]. (In order to separate mind from brain), it would be necessary to think of each neuron (as something distinct from its function), which is a little like [trying to separate the seawater (that provides the substance of an ocean wave) from the energy (that gives the wave its shape and motion)]. The existence of the wave requires both elements: (without energy), the wave would fall flat; (without water), the wave energy would have no expression. 仮定法過去 仮定法過去

投げやりです。すいません。英語皆無なので代行してください。

【必答問題 5 日常使う物のデザインをする際には標準化 (standardization) という方法がある。 という内容に続く次の英文を読んで、あとの問いに答えよ。(配点44) If we examine the history of advances in all technological fields, we see that some improvements come naturally through the technology itself, while others come through standardization. The early history of the automobile is a good example. The first cars were very difficult to operate. They required strength and skill beyond the abilities of many. Some problems were solved through automation. Other aspects of cars and driving were standardized through the long process of international standards committees: . On which side of the road to drive (constant within countries) country, but variable across On which side f the car the driver sits (depends upon which side of the road the car is driven) -The (2) of essential components: steering wheel, brake, clutch, and accelerator (the same, whether on the left- or right-hand side of the car) Standardization is one type of cultural constraint. With standardization, once you have learned to drive one car, you feel confident that you can drive any car, anyplace in the world. Standardization provides a major breakthrough in usability. I have enough friends on national and international standards committees to realize that the process f determining an internationally accepted standard is laborious. Even when all members agree on the merits of standardization, the task of selecting standards becomes a long, political issue. A small company can standardize its products without too much difficulty, but it is much more difficult for an industrial, national, or international body to agree to standards. There even exists a standardized procedure for establishing national and international standards. organizations works on standards. First, a set of national and international Then when a new standard is proposed, it must work its way through each organization's approval process. Standards are usually the result of a *compromise among the various competing positions, which can often be an inferior compromise. Sometimes the answer is to agree on (4 ). Look at the existence I both metric and *English units; of left-hand- and 18 right-hand-drive automobiles. There are several international standards for the *voltages and *frequencies of electricity, and several different kinds of electrical plugs and sockets- which cannot interchanged. With all these difficulties and with the continual advances in technology, are standards really necessary? Yes, they are. Take the everyday, clock. It's standardized. Consider how much trouble you would have telling time with a backward clock, where the hands revolved "counterclockwise." A few such clocks exist, primarily as humorous conversation pieces. When a clock truly violates standards, such as (the one in Figure 1, it is difficult to determine what time is being displayed. Why? The logic behind the time display is identical to that of conventional clocks: there are only two differences - the hands move in the opposite direction (counterclockwise) and the location of "12," usually at the top, has been moved. This clock is just as logical as the standard one. It. bothers us because we have standardized on a different scheme, on the very definition of the term clockwise. Without such standardization, clock reading would be more difficult: you'd always have to figure out the "mapping. E) compromise *metric メートル法の *English units イギリスの計量法(ヤードボンド法) *frequencies of electricity 電気の周波数 voltages E *mapping 対応づけ (2つのものの間の関係を意味する専門用語) 問1 下線部(1)の内容を、 同じ段落の自動車の例に基づいて30字以内の日本語で答えよ。た だし、句読点も字数に数える。 問2 本文中の空所 (2) に入る語として最も適当なものを、次のア~エのうちから一つ 選び 記号で答えよ。 7 color イ location ウ price I sight (239) 問3 第2パラグラフ (Standardization is one type of ...) について 次の Question に対す る Answer となるように、空所に入れるのに最も適当なものを,次のア~エのうちから一 つ選び、 記号で答えよ。 Question: What is "a major breakthrough in usability" provided by standardization? Answer Because of standardization, you ( device of the same kind all over the world. 7 can apply what you have learned to イ can make cannot produce I cannot use what you have learned when using 問7 下線部(5)が表す図 (Figure 1)として最も適当なものを、次のア~エのうちから一つ選 び記号で答えよ。 11 12 1 12 ) any machine or 10 2 10% 9 3 1 5 6 問4 下線部(3)の示す内容を, 40字程度の日本語で答えよ。 ただし, 句読点も字数に数える。 ウ 11 6 1 問5 次の文を第3パラグラフ (Ihave enough friends...) に入れるとき,本文中の①~ のうちのどの位置に入れるのが最も適当か、 次のア~エのうちから一つ選び, 記号 で答えよ。 9 3 Each step is complex, for if there are three ways of doing something, then there are sure to be strong proponents of each of the three ways, plus people who will argue that it is too early to standardize. 70 問8 最終パラグラフ (With all these difficulties...) の内容をもとに, 次の Question に2 語程度の英語一文で答えよ。 Question: According to the writer, why is the standardization of the everyday clo necessary? イ 2 ウ H O 問6 本文中の空所 (4) に入れるのに最も適当なものを、次のア~エのうちから一つ選び 記号で答えよ。 7 a single standard 1 several different standards ウ the same standard I too few standards <<-20-> <-21->

1番の1番はどうしてだめなのですか？

④不定詞 Bright Stage [A]空所に入れるのに最も適切な語句を,下の①~④ から1つずつ選びなさい。 ) avoid doing what one would rather not do. (I) (2) (3) Real wealth is ( being being able as to to be able to to find yourself able to (H) Harold went to the biggest bookstore in the town ( to getting 2 for getting to get The problem was ( much ) gifts for his friend. for to get (1) 65 ) complex for him to handle alone. (3) as ④100(東洋大) 94