fについてです 解説が載っていなかったため質問しています、。 なぜ、③を選ぶことができるのでしょうか？

Long-s doctrin holds that we are protected from fungi not just by layered immune defenses but ( e ) we are mammals*, with core temperatures higher than fungi prefer. The cooler outer surfaces of our bodies are at risk of minor assaults-think of athlete's foot*, yeast infections, ringworm*-but in people with healthy immune systems, invasive* infections have been ( f ). That may have left us overconfident. "We have an enormous (g) spot," says Arturo Casadevall, a physician and molecular microbiologist at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. "Walk into the street and ask people what are they afraid of, and they'll tell you they're afraid of bacteria, they're afraid of viruses, but they don't fear dying of fungi." Ironically, it is our successes that made us vulnerable*. Fungi exploit damaged immune systems, but before the mid-20th century people with impaired immunity didn't live very long. Since then, medicine has gotten very good at keeping such people (h), even though their immune systems are compromised by illness or cancer treatment or age. It has also developed an array of therapies that deliberately suppress immunity, to keep transplant recipients healthy and treat autoimmune* disorders such as lupus* and rheumatoid arthritis*. ( i ) vast numbers of people are living now who are especially vulnerable to fungi. Not all of our vulnerability is the fault of medicine preserving life so successfully. Other ( j ) actions have opened more doors between the fungal world and our own. We clear land for crops and settlement and perturb* what were stable balances between fungi and their hosts. We carry goods and animals across the world, and fungi hitchhike on them. We drench crops in fungicides* and enhance the resistance of organisms residing nearby. (s) ELSE

2行目のbutからの文構造がいまいち分からないです。by whichの部分をどのように捉えたら良いのかと、once moreは副詞として使われているのでしょうか？ 教えて頂けると嬉しいです。よろしくお願いします。

Part B 総合 gone quiet recently, because genetics has proved a lot more complicated than was originally hoped or, indeed, expected. But as the processes by which genes control cells, and thus bodies, come to be understood, the ould be the controversy is certain once more to grab the headlines. that breakthrough (3) be possible through methods other

この文章に文構造を書き込んでいただきたいです🙇‍♀️

文章構造図 英文の黒網⇒キーセンテンス ...⇒別冊ナビブック本文解説 5 1 The recipe for making any creature is written in its DNA. So last year, when geneticists* published the near-complete DNA sequence of the long-extinct woolly mammoth, there was much speculation about whether we could bring this giant creature back to life. 10 e Creating a living, breathing creature from a genome* sequence that exists only in a computer's memory is not possible right now. But someone someday is sure to try it, predicts Stephan Schuster, a molecular biologist at Pennsylvania State University and a driving force behind the mammoth genome project. 3 So besides the mammoth, what other extinct beasts might we bring back to life? Well, [besides) it is only going to be possible with creatures for which we can recover a complete genome sequence. (1)Without one, there is no chance. And usually when a creature dies, the (=Without a complete genome sequence, there is no chance of bringing an extinct creature back to life.) DNA in any flesh left untouched is soon destroyed as it is attacked by sunshine and 2 leave O done) bacteria.

（4）の答えがthe problemでしたがsolving the problemではダメでしょうか？

humans. "We were able to identify one of the many molecular features that likely shape behavior," she adds. ** hol boquete es Though the origins of the dog/human partnership remain unknown, it's becoming increasingly clear that each species has changed (during our long years header The physical differences between a basset hound and wolf are obvious, but dogs have also changed in ways that are more than skin (or fur) deep. One recent study shows how by bonding with us and learning to work ogether with humans, dogs may have actually become worse at working together Their pack lifestyle and mentality appear to be reduced and are far as a species. less prevalent even in wild dogs than in wolves. But, Yale's Laurie Santos says, dogs may have compensated in other interesting ways. They've learned to use humans to solve problems. "Several researchers have presented dogs and wolves with an impossible problem (e.g., a puzzle box that can't be opened or a pulling tool that stops working) and have asked how these different species react," Santos explains. Researchers have found that wolves try lots of different trial and error tactics to solve the problem - they get at it physically. But at the first sign of trouble, dogs do something different. They look back to their human companion for help. This work hints that dogs may have lost some of their physical problem-solving abilities in favor of more social strategies, ones that rely on the unique sort of cooperation

ヌクレオチドってどこからくるんですか？

並べ替えの問題がわかりません🥲教えてくださいお願いします🙇‍♀️

rmativ nt Each of us carries just over 20,000 genes that encode everything from the keratin in our hair down to the muscle fibers in our toes. It's no great (1) (own / came / where / from / our / mystery / genes): our parents bequeathed them to us. And our parents, in turn, got their s genes from their parents. But where along that genealogical line did each of those 20,000 protein-coding genes get its start? That question has hung over the science of genetics (2) (ago / dawn / century / since / a / ever / its). "It's a basic question of life: how evolution generates 1 novelty," said Diethard Tautz of the Max Planck Institute for 10 Evolutionary Biology in Plön, Germany. New studies are now bringing the answer into focus. Some of our genes are immensely old, perhaps (3) (to / way / back / dating / all the / the) earliest chapters of life on earth. But a surprising number of genes emerged more recently. many in just the past few million years. The youngest evolved after our 15 own species broke off from our cousins, the apes. Scientists (4) (being / finding / into / are / genes / come / new) at an unexpectedly fast clip. And once they evolve, they can quickly take on essential functions. Investigating how new genes (5) (understand / help / become / scientists / important / may / so) the role they may play in diseases like cancer. [1] Read the passage and rearrange the seven words in (1) - (5) in the correct order. Then choose from 1-4 the option that contains the third and fifth words. (1) 13rd: our (2) (3) (4) (5) 5th: genes 3rd: ago 5th: since 3rd: back 5th: the 2 3rd: where 5th: came 2 3rd: its 5th: ever 23rd: the 5th: back 2 3rd: genes 5th: into 1 3rd: genes 5th: being 1 3rd: may 5th: scientists 3 3rd: scientists 5th: understand 3 3rd: genes 5th: from 3 3rd: its 5th: a 3 3rd: way 5th: back 3 3rd: finding 5th: genes 23rd: important 5th: help 43rd: help 3rd: own 5th: came 3rd: came 5th: dawn 43rd: the 5th: the 4 3rd: new 5th: come 5th: understand may may understand thep (早稲田大) wystery. ne TOL Recome Sc

教えてください！！

2 下線部に最も近い意味を表す語(句)を1つ選びなさい。 (各1点、計5点) 101 The organization provided him with funds to carry out a survey of medical genetics. build 3 finish 4 summarize 2 conduct 102 Be sure to put out the fire before you leave the campground. 3 lay 4 light 2 extinguish 1 blow (玉川大) 103 She was brought up to believe that money isn't the most important thing in life. 1 taught 2 raised 3 deceived 4 inclined (高知大) (関西外語大) 104 Betty's friends are making fun of her new hairstyle. Don't you think that it's really strange? 1 cutting off 2 holding on 3 laughing at 4 thinking about 105 Anyone, regardless of age, is welcome to join our club. O although old 3 however old 2 because of age 4 instead of age (中部大) (愛知学院大)

問12の解き方がわかりません

22.4L, 2.5g/L×22.4L=56g したがって, この気体の分子量は56である。 問 12 同温同圧において、 同じ体積の気体Aと窒素 N2 の質量を比較したところ, 気体Aの質量は窒素の質量の1.5倍であった。 気体Aの分子量はいくらか。 平均分子量 空気のような混合気体でも,モル 質量を考えることができる。 混合気体のモル質量 は, 成分気体のモル質量とその混合割合から求め られ,その数値を平均分子量という。たとえば, average molecular weight 図9のように, 空気を窒素と酸素が物質量比4:1 で混合した気体とすれば, 空気のモル質量は,次 のように求められる。 4 28.0g/mol× 4+1 窒素の モル質量 + 32.0g/mol× 窒素の 混合割合 酸素の モル質量 1 4+1 酸素の 混合割合 28.8g/mol (13) 空気のモル質量 したがって, 空気の平均分子量は28.8である。 合 b 16 ･酸素 分子 H窒素分子 空気 1 mol 体積 22.4L 窒素分子 6.02×10²×4個 酸素分子 6.02×102 × ÷個 モル質量 28.8g/mol. 図9 空気の構成 15 15 20 平均分子量 28.8) よりも重い(密度が大きい)ものを2

全文訳お願いします！

4 20 科学 420 words Chapter 1 The recipe for making any creature is written in its DNA. So last year, when 1-1 geneticists* published the near-complete DNA sequence of the long-extinct woolly mammoth, there was much speculation about whether we could bring this giant creature back to life. 5 東京理科大学 Creating a living, breathing creature from a genome* sequence that exists only in a computer's memory is not possible right now. But someone someday is sure to try it, predicts Stephan Schuster, a molecular biologist at Pennsylvania State University and a driving force behind the mammoth genome project. So besides the mammoth, what other extinct beasts might we bring back to life? Well, 12 10 it is only going to be possible with creatures for which we can recover a complete genome Without one, there is no chance. And usually when a creature dies, the (1) - DNA in any flesh left untouched is soon destroyed as it is attacked by sunshine and bacteria. sequence. There are, however, some circumstances in which DNA can be preserved. If your 15 specimen froze to death in an icy wasteland such as Siberia, or died in a dark cave or a really dry region, for instance, then the probability of finding some intact stretches of DNA is much higher. Even in ideal conditions, though, no genetic information is likely to survive more than a million years. - so dinosaurs are out and only much younger remains are likely to yield good-quality DNA. "It's really only worth studying specimens that are less than 100,000 years old," says Schuster. The genomes of several extinct species besides the mammoth are already being sequenced, but turning these into living creatures will not be easy. "It's hard to say that something will never ever be possible," says Svante Pääbo of the Max Planck Institute 25 for Evolutionary Anthropology in Germany, "but it would require technologies so far removed from what we currently have that I cannot imagine how it would be done." But then (3) 50 years ago, who would have believed we would now be able to read the instructions for making humans, fix inherited diseases, clone mammals and be close to creating artificial life? Assuming that we will develop the necessary technology, we have 30 selected ten extinct creatures that might one day be resurrected. Our choice is based not just on practicality, but also on each animal's "charisma" - just how exciting the prospect of resurrecting these animals is. 1-3

英語の正誤問題です。教えてほしいです。

|4 次の英文の下線部の中で誤りを含むものを1つ選び,その番号をマークしなさい。 胆 TWA りが無い場合は, NO ERROR の番号をマークしなさい。or wedi atf7 (1) I think everybody in my aclass ohave a good @opinion of ome. oNO ERROR ア 9no ss1 To 1od b'ooY (2) oElevated physical activity can help you lose weight and reduce @your risk of developing many of the illnesses gassociated with obesity. NO ERROR slfondmu s sn l rsobreow ] イ 1MODgen TL]Pporgg so zagp 2om (3) Research min genetics and DNA «having had a profound influence Gon the direction of treatment for ga large number of diseases. 6NO ERROR sld od revon Ttro Stasata odtao olgosg mort a19ylh 9let ayewis ob vdV ウ s ts tee of (4) Having ofinished his term paper gbefore the gdeadline, git was delivered to the professor sbefore the class. @NO ERROR botring vbretle91s ateyi ot エ qode bif TL opoga sccebyoq speul w gpe p A (5) The sum of oall echemical reactions in ean organism's living cells gare called Gits metabolism. @NO ERROROV fnob algoo fons eYRE btadl ati tagw eldirod didb uo to! オ toum oot o bragelb uo Jadi slaidly o/ Jnob tud @ Dphon pung boeapje po pep enstApogA on ece' pontp,