学年

教科

質問の種類

英語 高校生

6の5行目until〜 このuntilってコンマの前にあるからコンマの前の文に含まれるんじゃないんですか? なぜ後の文に含まれるんですか? あと訳〜までずっとだと思うんですけどそんな訳なくて、どういう働きしてるんですか?これ

ESH CASE kno we c Per sp abo und feal Wo 10 per a C doo ar be gr 151 語句 recent [形] 最近の/biology 名 生物学/pioneer 名 先駆者/ parallel compu 並列計算 (複数の計算装置が協力して1つの処理を行うこと)/quantum computing 計算/3 in fact 事実、 実際/ remarkable 形 非凡な, 目立った/consider OCO をC hide 圃隠す/trick 秘訣 優れた技術 / insist on -ing 〜するといって譲らない なす, 考える/magician 名 魔術師/* be content to 原形 〜することにしてい introductory class 入門クラス / undergraduate 名 学部生 / exceedingly 非常に rare for ~ ~ では [としては]珍しい/academic 名 学者/ironic 形 皮肉っぽい/S of humor ユーモアのセンス/practical 形 実際に役立つ, 実践的な / everyday By 普通の/term 圈 専門用語, 言葉 / favorite 人気者 文法・構文 '<A + 名詞> は具体例の目印です (Rule 8 p.89)。 今回も、 「才能だけでな コミュニケーション力も大切」という主張の具体例として Richard Feynmanが挙げ れています。 21つ目のandは、過去形の動詞2つ (madeとwas) を結んでいます。 文と合わせて not A. {But} B. 「AでなくB」 から 「But が消える」パターンです。 s' ht 0 1かつてショーペンハウ 天才は他の誰にも見えない的 たちにも的を見てほしいと望 1 talent 名 (単数・複数 6' (Perhaps) the best example of 〈how Feynman combined brilliance w exceptional communication skills) was a talk [he gave a few days (afte 限定の副詞 Christmas) (in 1959)]. 2 (Starting from a basic question [about (what would take 真 s 飯 to shrink the Encyclopedia Britannica (to fit on the head of a pin)〉]), he moved (step by step) (until (in less than an hour), he ha invented the field of nanotechnology). witch.on. ozleitud (2aer gi sv しいと思う R ファインマンがどのように優れた才能と並外れたコミュニケーション能力を組み 合わせたかを示すのに最もよい例はおそらく, 1959年のクリスマス数日後に彼が行った 講演だろう。 ブリタニカ百科事典を圧縮して針の先端程度の面積に収めるにはどうする 必要があるだろうかという基本的な問題から始まって, 彼は段階を追って話を進め, 1時 間もしないうちにナノテクノロジーという領域を発案してしまったのである。 1 文法・構文 1We tend to treat km 2We act (as if havin Icombine A with BAとBを組み合わせる/brilliance 名 抜群の才能,才気/ exceptional 形並外れた / shrink 圧縮する / Encyclopedia Britannica ブリタニカ百 科事典/fit ぴたりと収まる / step by step 段階を追って / invent 発明する、考え出 す / nanotechnology ナノテクノロジー 2 through quiet study)). 文法・構文 'a few days は after Christmas 「クリスマスのあと」の範囲を限定していて、 「ク ( esinebut リスマスの数日後」 という意味になります。 take 名詞 to 原形〉「~するには名詞が必要である」で、「名詞がwhat になり前に出た形 what it would take to ~ は、 本来 〈it would です(間接疑問) to the realm of the s species)]. Yet, (as 77 'Schopenhauer (once) said (that, "talent hits a target [no one else can hit 中] Genius hits a target no one else can see off. 2Feynman was a genius v' [who wanted us to see it too]. V logically) unsound ( (to ourselves) (in a anything [that we knowledge, but 訳 an 私たちは知識 私たちは、専門的なス るものであるかのよ 人間と交流するため」 ュタインが何十年か ュニケーションをと 私たちは,自分か 知識を持つこ さないのである。 語句 ' tend to 域 / 2 act as if S ある, 手に入れる/ ~と交流する/ private langua 主張する/ 文法・構文 2 係なく were す。 our s いた the spe

解決済み 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

英語わかる方教えてください😭

[2] あるクラスでディベートが行われています。 (1)~(3)はディベートの前半戦, (4)(5)は後半戦における発言の (1) 一部です。 ディベートの流れを意識しながら, 進行役の先生のセリフ が流れよく成り立つよう, 下線に当てはまるものを選択肢から選び, 記号で答えなさい。 [思・判・表] (2) (教科書 P.88~89, P.92~95 参照) (3) (1) Teacher Are you ready to start our class debate? (4) Our topic is here on the board: "Digital books are better than paper books." Raise your hand if you have a reason to support for this statement. (2) Student A: With an eReader, we have access to all of the books that we own. We can read many G (5) on the train. We can't carry many books with us every day. Teacher: (3) Student B Paper books don't use electricity. It's important that we use as little electricity as possible to prevent global warming. Teacher: (5点x5) (4) Teacher: Next, we will refute the other side's opinions. Say which opinion you are refuting, give your refutation, then give an example. (5) Student C: They said that digital books are convenient, but I don't think it's a big advantage. We don't always need all of our books with us. Just one book is enough. Teacher: [選択肢] J. Good idea. "Good for the environment." . Great. "Digital books are convenient." . Let's start with the negative side. 1. Let's start with the affirmative side. I. Very good. "Not a significant advantage."

解決済み 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

問4の⑤の計算はどうすれば合うのですか。 教えてください🙇‍♀️ 3枚目が答えです。

次の英文を読んで,下の設問に答えなさい。 Last year, 4.2 million babies died. That is the most recent number reported by UNICEF of deaths before the age of one, worldwide. We often see lonely and emotionally charged numbers like this in the news or in the materials of activist groups or organizations. They produce a reaction. Who can even imagine 4.2 million dead babies? It is so terrible, and even worse when we know that almost all died from easily preventable diseases. And how can anyone argue that 4.2 million is anything other than a huge number? You might think that nobody would even try to argue (that, but you would be wrong. That is exactly why I mentioned this number. Because it is not huge: it is beautifully small. If we even start to think about how tragic each of these deaths is for the parents who had waited for their newborn to smile, and walk, and play, and instead had to bury their baby, then this number could keep us crying for a long time. But who would be helped by these tears? Instead let's think clearly about human suffering. The number 4.2 million is for 2016. The year before, the number was 4.4 million. The year before that, it was 4.5 million. Back in 1950, it was 14.4 million. That's almost 10 million more dead babies per year, compared with today. Suddenly this terrible number starts to look smaller. In fact (2)the number has never been lower. Of course, I am the first person to wish the number was even lower and falling even faster. But to know how to act, and how to prioritize resources, nothing can be more important than doing the cool-headed math and realizing what works and what doesn't. And this is clear: more and more deaths are being prevented. comparing the numbers. (3). We would never realize that without

解決済み 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

答え合ってますでしょうか😭😭

さいご 11. "How ( ) will the train come in?" how soon (残り時間)あとどのくらいの時間でんするん "In a quarter of an hour." 1 often 2 soon 3 long At much 12. Do you know when ( ) our homework? Do you know pobo...?. 13.( 1 does the teacher usually give back 2 usually gives back the teacher 3 does usually teacher gives back 4 the teacher usually gives back ) is the best person for this job? Do you think who 3 Who do you think 14. Your aunt hardly ever leaves her house, ( 1 is she <疑問詞を知ってますか? do You 麻布大〉 <東邦大 > think <疑問詞)~を知っていますか 2 Of who do you think 4 Is he you think (9396 〈中京大) itası ?否定文には肯定形の付加疑問をつづける ② does she isn't she④ doesn't she (1) 15. She looks nice in the dress, ( ①doesn't she 16. Let's break for lunch, ( 17. ( (大博込) I do you isn't she ?肯定文には否定形の付加疑問をつづける onitsb jon 290b 3 don't you w 4 is she <駒澤大〉 )? Let'sで始まる命令の付加疑問はshall we?で表す om oy blue S☐ 2 don't you 3 will you ow ④ shall we 〈関西外国語大〉 ) was it like visiting Tokyo for the first time in fifteen 1 What years? What is S like? 2 How to W & 3 When 4 That はどのような~で特 18. How ( ma (1) long story 2 much you didn't go to the party? How come+平叙衣…?どうして~するのですか ☐ 19. ( ) did Tom go to Hokkaido for? What ... for?何のために~するのですか〈目的・理由> 3 far odw (9) ④come 〈日本大〉 (ART How 2 What or W & 3 When W④Where 〈南山大 >

解決済み 回答数: 1
1/86