学年

教科

質問の種類

英語 高校生

英作文の添削をお願いします。🙏 写真一枚目 問 写真二枚目 回答 写真三枚目 解答例・問和訳等

名古屋大・文系 English words in length (Indicate the number of words you have written at the end of your answer. Do not count punctuation such as compras or periods as words 1 200 donors and delivers blood products to those who need them. Figure A below By year the Japanese Red Cross Society collects blood from voluntary shows how the mambers of younger (between the ages 16 and 39) and older between the ages 40 and 69) blood donors have changed in Japan from 2000 to 2019, as well as how the number of all blood donors has changed for the nineteen-year period. Figure B shows the total amount of blood donated in Linear trend lines are shown in dotted lines. Japan from 2000 to 2019 7.000.000 6.000.000 5.000.000- 4.000.000 3.000.000 2.000.000 1.000.000 Figure A Age (1639 years) A Age (40-69 years) .... ● All donors B. 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2000 2011 2013 2015 2017 2019 Years Amount of blood donated (liters) 2.000.000 2.000.000 1,500,000- 1.000.000- 500,000- Figure B QUESTIONS 2023 17 04 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 2019 Years Adapted from: Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare website https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/0000063233.html Write three 1. Describe what the Figure A show. trend lines in approximately 30 to 50 words. (Indicate the number of words you have written at the end of your answer Do not count punctuation such as commas or periods as words.) 2. Describe the trend depicted in Figure B. and explain how the amount of blood donated per donor has changed since 2000 by referring to both (Indicate the Figures A and B. Write approximately 30 to 50 words. Do not number of words you have written at the end of your answer. count punctuation such as commas or periods as words.)

解決済み 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

九大2020年度英作文です。 どなたか添削して頂けないでしょうか🙇‍♀️🙇‍♀️

g 3), of d to sinion. nerican ments. ing and writing, orms than 九州大理系前期 〔4〕 次の英文の説明と指示に従い,英語の文章を書きなさい。(30点) Lew Most Japanese high school students have to choose their course of study either from humanities ("bunkei") or science ("rikei") in the middle of their high school education. One of the reasons is to help students prepare for university entrance examinations and reduce their burden of subjects studied. At the same time, this narrows the range of choices for their future careers at Chebet a very early stage. Write your opinion on this current practice in a well-organized paragraph. It should be approximately 100 English words long, including specific reasons to support your argument. 〔5〕 次の文章の下線部(1), (2)を英語に訳しなさい。 ( 27点) 2020年度 英語 15 Okue 250 (E) 220 インターネットと検索エンジンのおかげで,あるトピックに関してどんな論文 がすでに発表されているのかを調べるのは、格段に簡単になった。 そこで何を 始めるにもまずは既存研究を調べましょう, となるのだが、下手をするとすぐに 「こんなにたくさんの研究がされている。 自分たちに出る幕などありません」 とい あんたん う暗澹たる気分になってしまう。 (1) 研究で楽しいのはなんと言っても問題について自分で考え、解決に向けて自分 で試行錯誤する時間, そして何かが解決できた瞬間である。 そこで,あまり真面 目に既存研究調査などせずにそれを始めた場合どうなるか? おそらく多くの場 合、苦労をして考えついたアイデアや作り上げたソフトウェアに似た先行研究が あるということを後から思い知ることになるのだろう。だがそれは、無駄な時間 だったのだろうか? (2) 一人の人間が情報を消費することに一生を費やしても、決して吸収しきれない 情報があふれている。 徹底調査をし、ひたすら再発明をしないことに向けて最適 化すべきなのか, それとも, 再発明の危険があってもまずは自分で脳を全開にす ること,それ自身を目的関数にしてよいのか? 真面目に考えてもよい時になって いる気がする。 田浦健次朗 「車輪の再発明と研究者の幸せ」

解決済み 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

至急!!私立大学看護学部の過去問です。答えがないため、回答を作って欲しいです!!科目は英語です。

問題番号に対応 効とする。 うち受験票お researchers at the University of Veterinary Medicine in Vienna, Austria, have found. Dogs won't give food to a human, even if that person gave them some food first, and that they would help other dogs that had helped them before. Therefore, the team Previous studies have shown that dogs can recognize cooperative and uncooperative humans, "reciprocal altruism"- that is, doing a good thing in return to a human who had given expected to find that their test subjects would put these two things together and show To start, the team trained a group of 37 dogs to press a button which would activate a them food first. *enclosure with the dispenser, while one of (2) two humans was in a separate enclosure with the button. One would press the button to food dispenser. Then, they put each dog in an would not. Each dog was paired with both humans in give food to the dog, and (4) unhelpful one. turn. After that, the researchers switched over the button and the dispenser. They expected that the dogs would press the button to give food to the helpful human but not to the though the dogs did press the button, they did it just as often when either human had the food dispenser, and even when no human was there at all. "In these kinds of studies (5) [perform / to / dogs / which/ trained / are in a particular behavior for an experiment, they will usually do the behavior a few times as they have simply learned the association between the behavior and getting a reward, and it may be enjoyable for them to do the behavior," said Jim McGetrick, a PhD student at the University of Veterinary Medicine in Vienna who led the research. 身を正しく が本冊子 1番 2 次の英文を読んで下の設問に答えなさい。 (3) giving us some food? Are they a combination of reasons. "It is (6) Why wouldn't our best pals want to help us out by secretly all bad boys and girls? McGetrick believes there is possible that the dogs did not understand enough about the task to realize that only one of the humans was providing them with food," he said. It could also be because they didn't fully understand the button and dispenser system, or because they were too focused on the food to notice whether a particular human was pressing the button or not. "Having said all that, even if they did completely understand the task and were fully attentive to the actions of the humans, there is still a good possibility that they wouldn't have given food back in return," he added. "It could be that providing food to a dog as they do not typically do that in everyday life." After all, humans are the ones who human is something very strange for (7) already have food, from a dog's perspective. why would your pet need to worry about (8) making sure you have enough? However, all the humans in the study were people the dogs didn't know. "It is quite 5

回答募集中 回答数: 0