学年

教科

質問の種類

英語 高校生

問4の⑤の計算はどうすれば合うのですか。 教えてください🙇‍♀️ 3枚目が答えです。

次の英文を読んで,下の設問に答えなさい。 Last year, 4.2 million babies died. That is the most recent number reported by UNICEF of deaths before the age of one, worldwide. We often see lonely and emotionally charged numbers like this in the news or in the materials of activist groups or organizations. They produce a reaction. Who can even imagine 4.2 million dead babies? It is so terrible, and even worse when we know that almost all died from easily preventable diseases. And how can anyone argue that 4.2 million is anything other than a huge number? You might think that nobody would even try to argue (that, but you would be wrong. That is exactly why I mentioned this number. Because it is not huge: it is beautifully small. If we even start to think about how tragic each of these deaths is for the parents who had waited for their newborn to smile, and walk, and play, and instead had to bury their baby, then this number could keep us crying for a long time. But who would be helped by these tears? Instead let's think clearly about human suffering. The number 4.2 million is for 2016. The year before, the number was 4.4 million. The year before that, it was 4.5 million. Back in 1950, it was 14.4 million. That's almost 10 million more dead babies per year, compared with today. Suddenly this terrible number starts to look smaller. In fact (2)the number has never been lower. Of course, I am the first person to wish the number was even lower and falling even faster. But to know how to act, and how to prioritize resources, nothing can be more important than doing the cool-headed math and realizing what works and what doesn't. And this is clear: more and more deaths are being prevented. comparing the numbers. (3). We would never realize that without

解決済み 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

2行目赤線部 なぜ形容詞のカタマリが後ろに回ったんですか? そんなの気づかないし、むずくないですか? 倒置でもないし、どうしたら気付きますかね

nced 29 Cook as a baby nces [in es clear C learn], pol)]>" ませ ウォッ [ 脳科 長に 新し の幼 示し よい 料不 ense ead 明 究 変わりませんよね (Rule 73 p.180)。 また,, which ~はa child's readiness to learn を先行詞とする関係代名詞の非制限用法です。 研究 show~の形 31 The findings (further) show the importance [of government food assistance V 0 programs, says Cook. 32 “These programs are very effective (in ensuring both the V S S V C food security and the health of school children and enabling them to go to school [ready to learn])," he says. 38 Making sure ({that kids get enough to eat) is good S V 33 S V C (for society) (in the long run), he says, (because hunger [experienced early in S life] can (really) set the direction [for a child's "ability to compete (in the job market) and to earn enough money to survive (as a member of society)]])." 訳 31 この研究結果はさらに,政府による食料支援政策の重要性を示していると TRY クは言う。 32 「そういった政策は,食料安全保証と学童の健康の両方を確保し、ま た彼らが,学習レディネスを備えた状態で学校に通えるようにするのにとても効 chlod 果的です」と彼は述べる。 33 子どもたちが十分な食料を得られるようにすること は,長い目で見れば社会にとってよいことであると彼は言うが,それは,人生の 初期段階で飢えを経験すると実際に,子どもの「労働市場で競争し、社会の一員 として生き残るのに十分なお金を稼ぐ能力」 の方向性が定まってしまう可能性が あるからである。 bypalom 31 food assistance 食料支援/program 名政策計画/32 ensure 確保する/ make sure {that} ~ 確実に~する, 〜を確実にする / in the long run 長期的 に見れば/set 設定する 決める / direction 名 方向性 / compete 競争す る / survive 生き残る, どうにかやっていく ebo 33 Lesson 11 ・構文 322つ目のand は2つの-ing (ensuring ~/enabling ~) を結んでいます。 ま ready to learn は, 直前のthem (= school children) を修飾する形容詞のカタ マリが後ろに回った形です。 33 Making sure 〜のカタマリを分詞構文と誤読して しまっても、後ろに is (V) が続いているため, 動名詞の主語だったと判断する ことができます。 また, and は2つの to不定詞 (to compete ~ / to earn ~ )を結 bloom & stow abil んでいます。 Tewal svad od ablo-diam- 12 bool # in food security and the health of school children and enabling them to go to school ready to learn," he says. Making sure kids get enough to eat is good for society in 20 the long run, he says, because hunger experienced early in life can really set the direction for a child's "bility to compete in the ich 197

解決済み 回答数: 2