学年

教科

質問の種類

英語 高校生

apartはどういう意味で使われてますか? 2行目でふ

E 20 15 17 The Intelligence of Crows 251 word Crows may not strike most people as intelligent creatures. We watch them picking apart garbage bags and complain about them to our neighbors. We take measures to stop them, but as often as not, they *outwit us. When we come to think of it, the reason we are so fed up with them could be that we do not give them credit for their intelligence. Crows may be smarter than any other animal apart from primates. For one thing, they remember the faces of humans and can tell one person from another. If someone tries to catch them, they will look 10 upon that person as a threat. They will remember the person even years later. And scientists have found that crows can solve puzzles. Their intelligence is close to that of a seven-year-old child. when I took this Many studies show that crows are also capable of using tools. They drop nuts on the road so that passing cars will crack them open. They can drop stones into a narrow container of liquid to bring the level up to where they can drink. They can use sticks to help themselves to hard- to-reach insects inside trees. And they can break off small branches from trees to build their nests, instead of just picking them up from the ground. Scientists say that the *densely-packed neurons in their small brains account for crows' intelligence. This suggests they may also feel emotions. So before you accuse crows of messing up your neighborhood, think about what intelligent creatures they are!( (注) outwit「~を出し抜く ~の裏をかく」 densely-packed neurons 「ぎっしり 脳神経細胞」 カラスの驚くべき知能 音声 カラスは、ほとんどの人に知能の高い生物という印象は与えていない について近所の人に愚痴を言う。 私たちはカラス対策を行うものの、ほとん かもしれない。私たちはカラスがごみ袋を荒らしているのを目にし、それら どの場合、彼らは人間を出し抜いてみせる。 それを考えてみると、 私たちが カラスにこれほどうんざりしている理由は、 私たちが彼らの知能を正しく 評価していないことにあるのかもしれない。 ② カラスは,霊長類は別として、他のあらゆる動物より賢いかもしれな ようになる。 数年後になっても彼らはその人のことを覚えている。 さらに. 科学者たちはカラスがパズルを解けることも研究により明らかにしている。 きる。 カラスを捕まえようとする者がいると、彼らはその人を脅威とみなす い。 その1例として、カラスは人間の顔を覚え、人と人を区別することがで 彼らの知能は7歳児のそれに近い。 ③ 多くの研究により, カラスは道具も使えるということがわかっている。 彼らは, 通行する車が木の実を割るために, 道路に木の実を落とす。液体が 入った縦長の容器に石を落とし、その液体が飲めるところまで水位を上げ 由にとって食べることもできる。 さらには巣を作るために、 ただ地面から木 ることができる。 枝を使って, 木の中の届きにくい場所にいる虫を自分で自 の枝を拾うのではなく、木から細い枝を折り取ることもできる。 21 20 38 科学者たちによれば、カラスの知能は、その小さな脳に高密度で詰まっ ているニューロンによるものだという。 これが示唆しているのは、彼らには 感情もあるかもしれないということだ。 だから、近所を荒らしていることで カラスを責める前に、 彼らがいかに知的な生物かということに思いを巡ら mont hags せてみよう that those) The mo 41 D cap of ✓ Check!! ● intelligent 知的な頭の良い intelligence 知能 : 知性 □ garbage (生) ごみ がらくた waste 名 廃棄物: 浪費 neighbor近所の人 prima 45 45 48 SO 52 支店 割れる □ mess を汚す; を無茶苦茶にする 散らかっている状態 -messy 散らかった 160 唆する を提案する 83

解決済み 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

投げやりです。すいません。英語皆無なので代行してください。

【必答問題 5 日常使う物のデザインをする際には標準化 (standardization) という方法がある。 という内容に続く次の英文を読んで、あとの問いに答えよ。(配点44) If we examine the history of advances in all technological fields, we see that some improvements come naturally through the technology itself, while others come through standardization. The early history of the automobile is a good example. The first cars were very difficult to operate. They required strength and skill beyond the abilities of many. Some problems were solved through automation. Other aspects of cars and driving were standardized through the long process of international standards committees: . On which side of the road to drive (constant within countries) country, but variable across On which side f the car the driver sits (depends upon which side of the road the car is driven) -The (2) of essential components: steering wheel, brake, clutch, and accelerator (the same, whether on the left- or right-hand side of the car) Standardization is one type of cultural constraint. With standardization, once you have learned to drive one car, you feel confident that you can drive any car, anyplace in the world. Standardization provides a major breakthrough in usability. I have enough friends on national and international standards committees to realize that the process f determining an internationally accepted standard is laborious. Even when all members agree on the merits of standardization, the task of selecting standards becomes a long, political issue. A small company can standardize its products without too much difficulty, but it is much more difficult for an industrial, national, or international body to agree to standards. There even exists a standardized procedure for establishing national and international standards. organizations works on standards. First, a set of national and international Then when a new standard is proposed, it must work its way through each organization's approval process. Standards are usually the result of a *compromise among the various competing positions, which can often be an inferior compromise. Sometimes the answer is to agree on (4 ). Look at the existence I both metric and *English units; of left-hand- and 18 right-hand-drive automobiles. There are several international standards for the *voltages and *frequencies of electricity, and several different kinds of electrical plugs and sockets- which cannot interchanged. With all these difficulties and with the continual advances in technology, are standards really necessary? Yes, they are. Take the everyday, clock. It's standardized. Consider how much trouble you would have telling time with a backward clock, where the hands revolved "counterclockwise." A few such clocks exist, primarily as humorous conversation pieces. When a clock truly violates standards, such as (the one in Figure 1, it is difficult to determine what time is being displayed. Why? The logic behind the time display is identical to that of conventional clocks: there are only two differences - the hands move in the opposite direction (counterclockwise) and the location of "12," usually at the top, has been moved. This clock is just as logical as the standard one. It. bothers us because we have standardized on a different scheme, on the very definition of the term clockwise. Without such standardization, clock reading would be more difficult: you'd always have to figure out the "mapping. E) compromise *metric メートル法の *English units イギリスの計量法(ヤードボンド法) *frequencies of electricity 電気の周波数 voltages E *mapping 対応づけ (2つのものの間の関係を意味する専門用語) 問1 下線部(1)の内容を、 同じ段落の自動車の例に基づいて30字以内の日本語で答えよ。た だし、句読点も字数に数える。 問2 本文中の空所 (2) に入る語として最も適当なものを、次のア~エのうちから一つ 選び 記号で答えよ。 7 color イ location ウ price I sight (239) 問3 第2パラグラフ (Standardization is one type of ...) について 次の Question に対す る Answer となるように、空所に入れるのに最も適当なものを,次のア~エのうちから一 つ選び、 記号で答えよ。 Question: What is "a major breakthrough in usability" provided by standardization? Answer Because of standardization, you ( device of the same kind all over the world. 7 can apply what you have learned to イ can make cannot produce I cannot use what you have learned when using 問7 下線部(5)が表す図 (Figure 1)として最も適当なものを、次のア~エのうちから一つ選 び記号で答えよ。 11 12 1 12 ) any machine or 10 2 10% 9 3 1 5 6 問4 下線部(3)の示す内容を, 40字程度の日本語で答えよ。 ただし, 句読点も字数に数える。 ウ 11 6 1 問5 次の文を第3パラグラフ (Ihave enough friends...) に入れるとき,本文中の①~ のうちのどの位置に入れるのが最も適当か、 次のア~エのうちから一つ選び, 記号 で答えよ。 9 3 Each step is complex, for if there are three ways of doing something, then there are sure to be strong proponents of each of the three ways, plus people who will argue that it is too early to standardize. 70 問8 最終パラグラフ (With all these difficulties...) の内容をもとに, 次の Question に2 語程度の英語一文で答えよ。 Question: According to the writer, why is the standardization of the everyday clo necessary? イ 2 ウ H O 問6 本文中の空所 (4) に入れるのに最も適当なものを、次のア~エのうちから一つ選び 記号で答えよ。 7 a single standard 1 several different standards ウ the same standard I too few standards <<-20-> <-21->

回答募集中 回答数: 0
1/14