かいてます

関係詞 4/10 第3章 25 精講 関係代名詞の非制限用法 ② 問題 別冊 32ページ The wolves' numbers had declined (by the 1920s) (through hunting) [swhich was not regulated (by the government)] more 接 Ranchers (on large farms) ((v) raising (o) cattle, (o) horses, and ( )sheep)) did not like owolves [because sthey vkilled otheir animals]. had declined の意味は? 従接 <had + 過去分詞形〉で過去完了です。 「ある動作が過去のある時点までに発 了していたことを示す」 のが主な働きです。 つまり, 1920年代になるまでに は既にオオカミの数が減少してしまっていたということを示しているわけです。 「部分訳] オオカミの数は減少していた 2 by と through の意味は? 前置 <by +時刻/曜日/年〉の場合, by は「~までに(は)」の意味を持ちます。 ここでの by は期限を表します。 I'll be back by 10:00. 「10時までには戻るね」 The fee should be paid by next Monday. 「料金は次の月曜までに払わなければならない」 ay l が その中でも 「日本出身の少女」 であることを 「制限」 して表します。 「少 女全般」から「日本出身の」 へと範囲を狭める働きですね。 一方、「非制限用法」 というのは、 関係詞節が先行詞の 「単なる補足説明」 になる場合です。 例えば Tokyo, which is the capital of Japan 「日本の首都」 首都である東京とされているのではなく、東京という首都の補足説明が 本文では, hunting 「狩猟」 を補足説明して 「狩猟は全般的に政府によって 規制がなされなかった」ということを意味しています。 ※なお日本語には形の面で制限用法と非制限用法はなく、文脈で判断します。 例えば「医学部志望の受験生諸君」 と言えば制限用法ですが、 「頑張っている 受験生諸君」は非制限用法です。 よって、 英文を訳すときには制限用法でも非 制限用法でも日本語訳は同じ(関係詞節→先行詞のように訳す)でよいでしょう。 部分訳 政府によって規制されなかった狩猟によって 第3章 ep process, a treated as yo s to the d dents, inju で訳すこともあるじかっどっちが 4 第2文はどんな構造? まず主語は Ranchers 「牧場経営者」ですね。直後の on large farms は形 容詞句として主語を修飾しています。もしandの後ろを sheep did not like wolvesと考えると、この部分の意味は通りますが、andの前の動詞がなくな ってしまいます。よって Ranchers に続くべき動詞は, did not like だとわか ります。 そして raising cattle, horses, and sheep も Ranchers を修飾する 形容詞句です。 部分訳] 牛,馬, 羊を飼っている大規模農場の (牧場経営者) mnment so re all in lof age, 関係代名詞の非制限用法と同じく、 「直前の名詞を補足的に説明する働き」 を持つも のに分詞構文があります。 伝統的な分類では分詞構文は副詞の働きですが、 形容詞の働きを しているととらえられることもあります。 関代の制限・非制限について through は、「~を通り抜けて」が基本的な意味で, そこから意味が発展し ていきます。 本文では, 「狩猟を通して」 では日本語がぎこちないので 「狩猟 によって」 とします。 by 1920sも through hunting も副詞句で 共に had declined を修飾してい ます。 [部分訳] 1920年代までに狩猟によって 3 hunting, which のコンマは何? Point 関係詞 解答例 関係代名詞・関係副詞節には「制限 [限定]用法」 と 「非制限用法」がありま す。「制限用法」は、関係詞節が説明する名詞(=先行詞) の意味を限定する きです。例えば a girl who is from Japan と言えば,少女は世界に数多くいる 政府が狩猟を規制することがなかったため、オオカミの数は狩猟によって1920年代までに 減少していた。牛馬羊を飼っている大規模な農場の牧場経営者は、オオカミを好まなか った。なぜならオオカミは彼らの動物を殺してしまうからだ。 76 S主語 V述語動詞 目的語 C補語 [] ( ) 解答 77 を持った牧場は

英語構文春A-K11 英文の構造の解説をお願いします🙇‍♀️

The rapid globalization of the economy has led to a more frequent interaction between diverse cultures than ever before, making the objective observation of cultural differences more essential for maintaining international harmony than the mere acquisition of language skills.

if not greater than がなんでこの位置にあるのか分かりません。解説して欲しいです。

It is rapidly becoming clear that Britain's pollution problems are equal to, if not greater than, those of China.

誤リを含んでいる下線部がどれなのか教えていただきたいです。よろしくお願いします。

Knowledge is a form of capital that is always unevenly [a]. distributed, and people who have more knowledge, or greater access to knowledge, enjoy advantages over people who have less. [b]. that knowledge stands in a close relation to power. [d] This means [c]. We speak of "knowledge for their own sake," but there is nothing we learn that does [e]. not put us into a different relation with the world-usually, we hope, a better relation.

疑問文 答え合ってますでしょうか😭😭

BR 1. What we do does not define ( ) we are. 1 whom ☐ 2. Could you tell me ( 2 who asub think) cer ③when deal ) person is driving to London? liw3 which mob spin alool sear how neob() who Hov ob not oploT paliaty soli di aw 1 when 2 where ☐ 3. ( ) made you try again? What Jail 2 When W ③3 Where WOHL ☐ 4. I found a sock on the floor, but I don't know (1) it is. 1 who's 5. ( 1 Where 2 who 3 that ) on earth did you go there last night? 2 What m ⒶWhy 'nbib nor ( ④ whose 〈大阪経済法科大〉 whose t 名〈亜細亜大〉 だれの名 og mot bib 3 Who 4 Why <東京工芸大〉 81

154.155の答えであるwho.whichはどちらもthatに代用可能だと思うのですが、この問題にthatを選んでも正解になるのでしょうか？who.whichがあるのにthatを選ぶのはアウトですか？

154 The boy ( 000 超定番 ① what ③ who ⑤ why I thought was a friend of mine proved to be a stranger. ② which ④ whose 154 「 (武蔵大学) 由 Last summer, I paid a visit to Athens, () is the capital of Greece. 155 000 ① it ③ where ② that ④ which 156 (東京経済大学)

赤い下線のところがどういう構造になっているか分からないです、教えてくださいm(_ _)m

moving from " (1) 点) There are historians and others who would like to make a neat division between "historical facts" and "values." The trouble is that values even enter into deciding what count as facts-there is a big leap involved in 'raw data" to a judgement of fact. More important, one finds that the more complex and multi-levelled the history is, and the more important the issues it raises for today, the less it is possible to sustain a fact-value division. But this by no means implies that there has simply to be a conflict of prejudices and biases, as the data are manipulated to suit one worldview or another. What it does mean is that the self of the historian is an important factor. The historian is shaped by experiences, contexts, norms, values, and beliefs. When dealing with history, especially the sort of history that is of most significance in philosophy, that shaping is bound to be relevant. As far as possible it needs to be articulated and open to discussion. The best historians are well aware of this. They are alert to many dimensions of bias and to the endless (and therefore endlessly discussable) significance of their own horizons and presuppositions. A great deal can of course be learned from those who do not share our presuppositions. Our capacity to make wise, well-supported judgements in matters of historical fact and significance can only be formed over years of discussion with others, many of whom have very different horizons from our own. It is possible to I have a 12-year-old chess champion or mathematical or musical genius, but it is unimaginable that the world's greatest expert on Socrates could be that age. The difficulty is not just one of the time to assimilate information; it is (2)

関係詞の問題です。教えてください

1.次の文の( )に入る適当な語句を ① ~ ④から選びなさい。 (1) The boy ( who ) I thought was a friend of mine proved to be a stranger. whom (2) I got two writing assignments last week. ( neither of which either of which which ) I have started yet. both of which neither one of them (3) The islanders were strongly influenced by the people and the things ( continent. who ②where (4) A: My writing has improved a lot in this class. B: Mine has, too. All the students ( whom Mr. Davis teaches them that Mr. Davis teaches them (5) The science of medicine, ( important of all sciences. for as ③what ) write well. whose 武蔵 [法政大 ) came from the that [京都学園大) which Mr. Davis teaches Mr. Davis teaches [愛知みずほ大] ) progress has been very rapid lately, is perhaps the most in which 3 since [関西学院大] 選びなさい

1枚目の写真の下線2の補足説明である、2枚目の写真についてなのですが、青い波線で引いているところはなぜそうなるのですか？

もわかっている場所と考え、 the seashore [the shore/thebeanとして Alessi s jad 19qaqawon odd ni bax I gmi Our society is aging [ageing graying / (*) 1 ingreying/ X getting old] rapidly [quickly] (,) and the 2 number of young workers [young laborers / young members of the workforce] is [× are] steadily Todman sds to a sdj ni basi I [gradually] decreasing. sablat] gainsbay al yddod saodw [slqosql 3

答えあっていますでしょうか🥲🥲

S 34. A dying man caught me ( ) the sleeve. cotch A by the sleeve Anzz 1 of 2 in (3 by 4 about 〈日本工業大) ) of the bad weather, it was impossible to climb the mountain. On account of A ①On account <理由> 35( い = because of A 2 Despite ③In spite 36. Our visit to the south of China was put off ( A①resulting ②reasoning 4 A kind Aの理由で女子美術大 owing to Aの理由で 〈関西外国語大 ) to my grandfather's ill health. An 3 accounting ④owing 37. We could not leave Narita International Airport on time (m) the strong wind. ⑰due due to 38. ( 2 off 3 without ) Tom, who introduced me to a good doctor, I recovered very quickly. 1 Because 2 Talking of 3 Owing ) the bad weather, our group kept on working outdoors. 19 Ap up to due to A Aの理由で Thanks to Thanks to A (*) Aの理由で <諫歩> □ 39.( 1 In case of 3 Despite of ② In spite of A 4 In the case of Aにもかかわらず = despite A netgo 〈名古屋工業大) 40. ( ) his learning, he still knew little about the matter. 1 Ahead of 2 Due to 41. ( ) his riches, he is not happy. 2 For all 1 In short 920 with all A Art" ④Together with ol < 東京電機大 〉 is ④According to 〈 花園大〉 For all A Alitaping" 3 In addition 3 With all