学年

教科

質問の種類

英語 高校生

比較についての問題を解いてみました! 明日授業があるので間違っていたら 教えて欲しいです🙏💧‬ 問題多くて申し訳ないです🙇‍♀️ よろしくお願いします!

(2)この本は私が思っていたよりずっと難しい。 This book is more difficult than I thought. (3) 日本人は世界で一番忙しい国民だと言われている。 It is said the Japanese are the busiest busy twice as old as my father. world. (4) 母は父より2つ年上だ。 My mother is [ difficult ] people in the [busy ] [old] 2. ( )内の語句を並べかえて, 英文を完成させなさい。 (1) Minami High School (as / twice/students/has/many/as) Kita High School. (2点×4=8点) Minami High School has twice as many students OS Kita High School. (2) The Beatles (far/popular / the / was/most/by) rock band in the world in the 1960s. rock band in the world in the 1960s. The Beatles was by far the most popular rock (3) Tokyo Tower (100 meters/than/is/about/taller) Fukuoka Tower. Tokyo Tower is about 100 meters taller than ....... Fukuoka Tower. (4)P'll (as/movies/watch/ possible / many/as) during summer vacation. I'll watch as many movies as possible during summer vacation. (1)南高校は、北高校の2倍の生徒がいる。(2)ビートルズは、1960年代に世界で一番人気のあるロックバンドだった。 3.[]内から適切な語を選び, 必要なら形を変えて, 対話文を完成させなさい。 (2点×4=8点) (1) A: I couldn't sleep very well last night. I slept only three hours. (3) 東京タワーは、福岡タワーより約 B: Really? You slept half as long (2) A: The more advanced technology becomes, the society becomes. B: I don't think so. The reality is not so simple. as me. RK better (3) A: Thank you for having recommended such an interesting book. B: It's the (4) A: Why did you behave best worse book I've ever read. good 100メートル高い。 our (4)私は夏休みの間に できるだけたくさん映画を観 るつもりだ。 best good better 最原比 at the party than usual. W B: I'm sorry. [bad/convenient/long/good] I was too excited and lost control of myself. "bad (1) あなたは私の半分の時間しか寝ていない。 worst bad worse (3)これは、私が今まで読んだ本の中で一番いい本だ。 (2)技術が進歩すればするほど、私たちの社会はより(4) どうしてパーティーでいつもより態度が悪かったの? ますますよくなる。

解決済み 回答数: 3
英語 高校生

添削お願いしますm(_ _)m

:45 演習 45 (問題→本冊: p.91) Some people are able to consider unemotionally all the good points and bad points of a decision. This method is certainly effective, although most of us generate emotions that interfere with logic. Let me repeat that you cannot make “no” decision, only a decision either to risk a choice or a decision not to risk a choice. [全文訳】 決心したことの長所と短所をすべて感情に動かされずに検討することのでき る人がいる。確かにこの方法は効果的である,とは言うものの私たちの中の大部分 の者は論理を阻害する感情を来たす。 繰り返して言わせてもらうと決心 「しない」 ということはできないし、むしろいちかばちか選択する決意をするか, 敢えて選択 しないという決意をするしかないのだ。 【解説】第1文の unemotionally は副詞で, consider (Vt) と2つの points という目 的語の間に割り込んでいる。 第2文の副詞 certainly は文中に入り込んでいるが,文修飾の役割を果たしている (→ 100 課)。 although 以下は文の流れから,また直前にカンマがあるので追加的に使 われていると考え、主節の後に訳すのがよい。 interfere の前のthatは関係代名詞主 格である。 第3文は Let の後の repeat が V で, その目的語である that 節内のカンマの前後を 比較して以下のようにとらえる。 you cannot make "no" decision, カンマ = but (you can) only (make) a decision either (to risk a choice) or (a decision) not (to risk a choice), カンマの後に not を置かないこと。 カンマが but の役割を果たしていて(→8課) decision を to risk, not to risk が形容詞的に修飾している(→57課)。

解決済み 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

問4の⑤の計算はどうすれば合うのですか。 教えてください🙇‍♀️ 3枚目が答えです。

次の英文を読んで,下の設問に答えなさい。 Last year, 4.2 million babies died. That is the most recent number reported by UNICEF of deaths before the age of one, worldwide. We often see lonely and emotionally charged numbers like this in the news or in the materials of activist groups or organizations. They produce a reaction. Who can even imagine 4.2 million dead babies? It is so terrible, and even worse when we know that almost all died from easily preventable diseases. And how can anyone argue that 4.2 million is anything other than a huge number? You might think that nobody would even try to argue (that, but you would be wrong. That is exactly why I mentioned this number. Because it is not huge: it is beautifully small. If we even start to think about how tragic each of these deaths is for the parents who had waited for their newborn to smile, and walk, and play, and instead had to bury their baby, then this number could keep us crying for a long time. But who would be helped by these tears? Instead let's think clearly about human suffering. The number 4.2 million is for 2016. The year before, the number was 4.4 million. The year before that, it was 4.5 million. Back in 1950, it was 14.4 million. That's almost 10 million more dead babies per year, compared with today. Suddenly this terrible number starts to look smaller. In fact (2)the number has never been lower. Of course, I am the first person to wish the number was even lower and falling even faster. But to know how to act, and how to prioritize resources, nothing can be more important than doing the cool-headed math and realizing what works and what doesn't. And this is clear: more and more deaths are being prevented. comparing the numbers. (3). We would never realize that without

解決済み 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

赤い下線のところがどういう構造になっているか分からないです、教えてくださいm(_ _)m

moving from " (1) 点) There are historians and others who would like to make a neat division between "historical facts" and "values." The trouble is that values even enter into deciding what count as facts-there is a big leap involved in 'raw data" to a judgement of fact. More important, one finds that the more complex and multi-levelled the history is, and the more important the issues it raises for today, the less it is possible to sustain a fact-value division. But this by no means implies that there has simply to be a conflict of prejudices and biases, as the data are manipulated to suit one worldview or another. What it does mean is that the self of the historian is an important factor. The historian is shaped by experiences, contexts, norms, values, and beliefs. When dealing with history, especially the sort of history that is of most significance in philosophy, that shaping is bound to be relevant. As far as possible it needs to be articulated and open to discussion. The best historians are well aware of this. They are alert to many dimensions of bias and to the endless (and therefore endlessly discussable) significance of their own horizons and presuppositions. A great deal can of course be learned from those who do not share our presuppositions. Our capacity to make wise, well-supported judgements in matters of historical fact and significance can only be formed over years of discussion with others, many of whom have very different horizons from our own. It is possible to I have a 12-year-old chess champion or mathematical or musical genius, but it is unimaginable that the world's greatest expert on Socrates could be that age. The difficulty is not just one of the time to assimilate information; it is (2)

解決済み 回答数: 1
1/54