学年

教科

質問の種類

英語 高校生

3. 問4 この回答だと10点満点だとしたら何点くらいでしょうか? 問5どう考えたら解説のようにnew methodsを2つのかたまりが修飾しているとわかるのですか?

30 methods. Only the larger landowners can afford to make the necessary investments for maximum production of the new grains. With their profits, the large landowners then buy land from the smaller farmers. This way, the large landowners become ever richer and the number of landless poor people increases. Social tensions naturally increase in this situation. 35 Clearly, it is time to question the methods of the Green Revolution. Governments and farmers_need to look at the overall picture and long-term effects. (s They need to find new methods that will better meet the needs of the world's hungry people and that will also be less harmful. Vi (注) fertilizer : 肥料 insecticide : 殺虫剤 (神戸学院大) 問1 空所( 1 ) に入れるのに最も適当なものを、次のア~エから1つ選びなさ Po =取り除く 遅れず遭いて行く 7. get rid of イ. run out of keep up with J. come up with 問2 空所(2a)~( 2d)に入れるのに最も適当なものを、次のア~エからそれ ぞれ1つずつ選びなさい。 ただし,文頭にくるべき語も小文字で始められてい る。 ア. social and political conflict イ. the nature of the chemicals that farmers have used 195 ウ. the_expense of the new farming methods 費用 エ. soil_erosion 下線部(3)の語(句) を文意が通るように並べ換えなさい。 下線部(4) の内容を50字以内の日本語で述べなさい。 下線部(5) を日本語に訳しなさい。 英文のタイトルとして最も適当なものを、次のア~エから1つ選びなさい。 Environmental effects of the “Green Revolution” Increase in food production through the “Green Revolution" Some negative aspects of the “Green Revolution" エ. Success of the “Green Revolution" 1. (a)7. () I (e)t leadp (24) ア 問3 問4 問5 問6 3. the grain people used to grow 間、新しい作物に移して得た不必大きなさの 所有者がさな農場の土地を買うこと。 8 ・間5.西府と農家は世界中の空腹な人々の需要を満たす より良い、新しい方法を見つけ、害を少なくしていく必要がある

未解決 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

この文の第二段落のamid calls for ~のcallsは、名詞でしょうか?前置詞のamidとcalls forのつながりが、なぜこのような訳になるのか理解できません。このcalls が名詞だと仮定して直訳すると、管理下において大規模に火を放つことを求める要求の最中に... 続きを読む

王 jon 【目標解答時間 15分 配点 37点 15 次の英文を読み, 下記の設問 (A~D) に答えなさい。 Fire is "a good servant but a bad master." In my house, in summer, I smell the air for the faintest hint of smoke as keenly as any horse or dog or kangaroo. I watch for columns of smoke, visualising again and again how fire could rush( 1 )the hill towards us. But if you are philosophical about it, fire is a natural 5 part of the Australian environment and has been for millions of years. Living with the threat of fire in the bush, or in the wild, is like living with sharks when diving, or with snakes while walking, or with traffic accidents on a city street. The idea that we should remove every shark from the sea, or every snake from the land, and control- burn, or deliberately set fire, to prevent any risk of 10 bushfires is a recipe for making the environment even worse. As Phil Koperberg, head of the New South Wales Fire Brigades, said ( 2 ) the Sydney bushfires of 1994, amid calls for massive control burning, “Do you want to concrete over all the bush? If you choose to live in the bush, you choose to accept the risk. f It is often claimed that some Austratian plants and animals have actually adapted to fire, evidence of an extraordinarily long period (millions of years before human arrival) during which fire has been more significant in the Australian environment than it has been on any other continent, but this is probably not strictly true. Many plants have adapted to the environment in 20 ways that also happen to be valuable in times of fire. ( 3 ), animals have adapted to a variety of different habitats, and can therefore survive during different periods of vegetation regrowth after a fire (or after, say, a cyclone, a flood, or just a tree falling in a forest). A tree that has the ability to regenerate from roots or lower trunk when the 25 upper tree dies as a result of being broken off in a storm, or falls over, rotten to the core, will also be able to respond when the upper part is killed by a fire. Seeds adapted to long hot droughts, and requiring a combination of heat and water for germination", will also find a fire, if followed by rain, a good stimulus for growing new plants. There does appear to be evidence that chemicals in 30 smoke can help promote growth in plants, but whether this is a direct 可能性があるかを 何度も が続いているのだ。 森林地帯, ダイビングのときにサメ, そやカンガルーにも負けな の匂いを嗅ぐ。 私は,どのよ 暮らすようなものである。 海 しき主人である」( れば, 火事はオーストラリア >> のヘビを取り除くべきだと 意図的に火を放つべきだ , 1994年のシドニー ている真っ只中 と言った。 入れるこ

未解決 回答数: 0
化学 高校生

質問です Pbは塩酸や硫酸には溶けないということは理解したのですが、硝酸には溶けますか?

12 (1) mol (2) 1.2×10mol (3) 48mg/L マンガン酸イオン MnO² 酸素 O2 酸化剤としてはたらくとき [[MO] [+8H[+] + 5e 0 + 4H+ + 4e マンガン酸カリウム KMnO [1mol は 5mol の電子を受け取り、Og または O + 4e- -mol 分に相当する。 mo ②週水20mL中の有機物を酸化するために、 5.0×10mol/L 1mol は 4mol の電子を受け取る。したがって、 KO1mol のはた KAO, 水溶液が4.8mL必要であったので、 1L(1000mL)中の有 化するのに必要な KMnO の物質量は、 4.8 1000 ml. 1000 20 ml. → MI + 4HO → 2HO → 20 =1.2×10mol 5.0×10mol/Lx は、試料ILに含まれる有機物を酸化するのに要するO2の質 位で表したものである。 (1)より、Kino.1molは、20 #*. mg -Lx. [molに相当するので,この河川水1L中の有機物を酸化するのに 必要なの物質量および質量は、 15 1.2×10molx -=1.5×10-³ mol 32g/mol×1.5×10mol=0.048g=48mg よって, COD は 48mg/Lとなる。 157 A:Zn B: Cu C: Na D : Ag E : Pb F: Fe G: Sn イオン化傾向の異なる金属を接触させると, イオン化傾向の大きい イオン化傾向が大きいと酸化されやすい。 B>D ほうはさらに反応しやすくなり, 小さいほうはさらに反応しにくく なる。 F G およびA>F (4)Cのイオン化傾向はきわめて大きい。 (5) イオン化傾向が水素より大きい金属は塩酸と反応して水素を発生。 A,C,F,G>H2>B,D 塩化鉛(ⅡI) PbClや硫酸鉛(ⅡI) PbSO4は水に不溶なため, 鉛は水 素よりイオン化傾向が大きいが, 塩酸や希硫酸には溶解しない。 つ まり, EはPb である。 よって, C>A>F>G>E>B>D Na Zn Fe Sn Pb Cu Ag 67 COD は、 chemical oxygen demand の略である。 塩化鉛(ⅡI)は冷水に 不溶だが、熱湯には溶け る。

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

5つの下線部の正しい訳を教えて欲しです。 至急お願いします🚨🙇

Unit 12 Change the World Basic A few years ago, an obesity* researcher at the University of Washington-named Adam Drewnowski ventured into the supermarket to solve a mystery. He wanted to (1) figure out why (2)poor people were more likely to suffer from obesity in America. Obesity is, as you know, mainly caused by taking in too many calories. For most of history the poor have typically suffered from a shortage of calories, not an excess. So why do the people with the least amount of money to spend on food tend to be overweight today? 目 Drewnowski gave himself a dollar to spend, using it to purchase as many calories as he possibly could. He discovered that he could buy the most calories per dollar in the middle aisles of the supermarket, among the towering piles of* processed food and soft drinks. 3 Processed food is, in the broadest sense, any food that is changed from its natural, raw state. But here, it refers to food which has been chemically changed by using additives* such as flavors, colors, preservatives*, stabilizers*, etc., or which has been combined with other foods in a manufacturing process. Generally speaking, if the ingredients* aren't “natural,” then we consider it to be ( 3 ). Drewnowski found that a dollar could buy 1,200 calories of cookies or potato chips, which are typical processed foods, but only 250 calories of carrots. Looking for something to wash down those chips, he discovered that his dollar bought 875 calories of soda (a processed food) but only 170 calories of orange juice. 5 As a rule, processed foods are more “energy dense*” than fresh foods: they contain less water and fiber but more added fat and sugar, which makes them both (4)less filling and more fattening. 5 These particular calories also happen to be the least healthful ones in the marketplace, which is why we call the foods that contain them "junk*.” Drewnowski concluded that the rules of the food game in America are organized in such a way that if you are eating (6) on a budget, the most rational economic strategy is to eat badly-and get fat.

未解決 回答数: 1