学年

教科

質問の種類

英語 高校生

答えあっていますでしょうか🥲🥲

14. (At the office) A Martin? B Yes? A Close the door, would you? I'm freezing. B( ) 1 What for? 15. Man Excuse me. 2 If I can. 3 No wonder. 4 Sure. I'm sorry.) Woman: Yes, sir. How can I help you? Man I'd like another glass of water, please. Woman ( ), sir. I'll bring one right away. 1 Certainly 2 Definitely 16. A Do you mind if I go first? ava B ( ) I'm in no hurry. A Thanks, I really appreciate it. T I wish you could. 3 Never mind. 17. A Shall we go out for dinner? 3 Perhaps i sve 'so I bodeton D Probably (*+****) lle i ok 2 Go ahead. I can't wait. din yno.go < 大阪経済法科大) gring o 3 Not at all. 4 See you tomorrow. 〈駒澤大〉 18. Tom Can you recommend a good restaurant in Shibuya? B( ( By all means. 2 Me too. ☐ James ( ) French Garden? They serve very nice organic vegetable dishes. Tom Sounds nice! I'll have lunch there with my friends. Could you tell me the exact exfood amoz food vendit sill of baband m'lASI place? ①Why don't you try ③ Why should you try 19. (Weekend plans) 2 Why not I'm to try ④What about not trying() Mike What will you do this weekend, Kana? Kana I don't know. What will the weather be like? *Mike: Well, the forecast says it's going to be sunny. (1) amo 1 blue Kana No thanks! I don't want to get another sunburn. 1 Who cares? 3 Why don't we go to the beach? ☐ 20. A Do you like action movies? B Yes, I love them. A: ( ) B That would be great! 〈盛岡大〉 2 Which film do you want to watch? ④When does summer start in your country? Are you seeing one together this weekend? 2 Will we be seeing one together this weekend? 3 How about seeing one together this weekend? ④What if we're seeing one together this weekend? 〈龍谷大〉

解決済み 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

答えあっていますでしょうか、、🥲25番の訳がわからなくて、、toは形容詞的用法でしょうか、、

先週の日曜日のサッカースタジアムで私が偶然会った人を推測した 23. Guess who I ran ( ) at the soccer stadium last Sunday. run into Aに偶然出会う ① to ②into ③ for ④ over. < 星薬科大 〉 ① results in ② differs from ③ gives up テレビのアドバイスを基に食べ物をえらぶととてもアンバランス(不均衡)な食事に終わる。 result in A 24. Making food choices based on television advertising ( ) a very imbalanced diet. Aに終わる 4 breaks out < 東京都市大〉 ☐ 25. Please ( ①① refer to ④ search to 私は彼がいくつかの困難を乗りこえるには十分強いと信じる 26. I believe he is strong enough to ( ) any difficulty. ③ see to ) the dictionary to find the meaning of a word you don't know. ② look to refer to A Aに駆する 南山大 get over A Aを克服する/乗りえる 大白目 1 catch up with② get over. ③ drop in 科学者たちは、ガンの治療法を見つけることに成功したと主張する ④ look up to <武蔵野美術大〉 27. Scientists claim they have succeeded ( ① found ② to find ) a cure for cancer. ③ finding 私が判決をまっていた間経験したことを誰も知らない. 28. No one knows what I went ( ④ in finding succeed doing Aに成功する )while I was waiting for the verdict. in A 〈高崎健康福祉大〉 9o through A 1 though (2 through 3 thorough 仕事を描けに行うためにあなたは彼女を頼ることができる ④ thoroughly Aを経験す部大

解決済み 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

投げやりです。すいません。英語皆無なので代行してください。

【必答問題 5 日常使う物のデザインをする際には標準化 (standardization) という方法がある。 という内容に続く次の英文を読んで、あとの問いに答えよ。(配点44) If we examine the history of advances in all technological fields, we see that some improvements come naturally through the technology itself, while others come through standardization. The early history of the automobile is a good example. The first cars were very difficult to operate. They required strength and skill beyond the abilities of many. Some problems were solved through automation. Other aspects of cars and driving were standardized through the long process of international standards committees: . On which side of the road to drive (constant within countries) country, but variable across On which side f the car the driver sits (depends upon which side of the road the car is driven) -The (2) of essential components: steering wheel, brake, clutch, and accelerator (the same, whether on the left- or right-hand side of the car) Standardization is one type of cultural constraint. With standardization, once you have learned to drive one car, you feel confident that you can drive any car, anyplace in the world. Standardization provides a major breakthrough in usability. I have enough friends on national and international standards committees to realize that the process f determining an internationally accepted standard is laborious. Even when all members agree on the merits of standardization, the task of selecting standards becomes a long, political issue. A small company can standardize its products without too much difficulty, but it is much more difficult for an industrial, national, or international body to agree to standards. There even exists a standardized procedure for establishing national and international standards. organizations works on standards. First, a set of national and international Then when a new standard is proposed, it must work its way through each organization's approval process. Standards are usually the result of a *compromise among the various competing positions, which can often be an inferior compromise. Sometimes the answer is to agree on (4 ). Look at the existence I both metric and *English units; of left-hand- and 18 right-hand-drive automobiles. There are several international standards for the *voltages and *frequencies of electricity, and several different kinds of electrical plugs and sockets- which cannot interchanged. With all these difficulties and with the continual advances in technology, are standards really necessary? Yes, they are. Take the everyday, clock. It's standardized. Consider how much trouble you would have telling time with a backward clock, where the hands revolved "counterclockwise." A few such clocks exist, primarily as humorous conversation pieces. When a clock truly violates standards, such as (the one in Figure 1, it is difficult to determine what time is being displayed. Why? The logic behind the time display is identical to that of conventional clocks: there are only two differences - the hands move in the opposite direction (counterclockwise) and the location of "12," usually at the top, has been moved. This clock is just as logical as the standard one. It. bothers us because we have standardized on a different scheme, on the very definition of the term clockwise. Without such standardization, clock reading would be more difficult: you'd always have to figure out the "mapping. E) compromise *metric メートル法の *English units イギリスの計量法(ヤードボンド法) *frequencies of electricity 電気の周波数 voltages E *mapping 対応づけ (2つのものの間の関係を意味する専門用語) 問1 下線部(1)の内容を、 同じ段落の自動車の例に基づいて30字以内の日本語で答えよ。た だし、句読点も字数に数える。 問2 本文中の空所 (2) に入る語として最も適当なものを、次のア~エのうちから一つ 選び 記号で答えよ。 7 color イ location ウ price I sight (239) 問3 第2パラグラフ (Standardization is one type of ...) について 次の Question に対す る Answer となるように、空所に入れるのに最も適当なものを,次のア~エのうちから一 つ選び、 記号で答えよ。 Question: What is "a major breakthrough in usability" provided by standardization? Answer Because of standardization, you ( device of the same kind all over the world. 7 can apply what you have learned to イ can make cannot produce I cannot use what you have learned when using 問7 下線部(5)が表す図 (Figure 1)として最も適当なものを、次のア~エのうちから一つ選 び記号で答えよ。 11 12 1 12 ) any machine or 10 2 10% 9 3 1 5 6 問4 下線部(3)の示す内容を, 40字程度の日本語で答えよ。 ただし, 句読点も字数に数える。 ウ 11 6 1 問5 次の文を第3パラグラフ (Ihave enough friends...) に入れるとき,本文中の①~ のうちのどの位置に入れるのが最も適当か、 次のア~エのうちから一つ選び, 記号 で答えよ。 9 3 Each step is complex, for if there are three ways of doing something, then there are sure to be strong proponents of each of the three ways, plus people who will argue that it is too early to standardize. 70 問8 最終パラグラフ (With all these difficulties...) の内容をもとに, 次の Question に2 語程度の英語一文で答えよ。 Question: According to the writer, why is the standardization of the everyday clo necessary? イ 2 ウ H O 問6 本文中の空所 (4) に入れるのに最も適当なものを、次のア~エのうちから一つ選び 記号で答えよ。 7 a single standard 1 several different standards ウ the same standard I too few standards <<-20-> <-21->

回答募集中 回答数: 0
1/12