学年

教科

質問の種類

英語 高校生

比較についての問題を解いてみました! 明日授業があるので間違っていたら教えて欲しいです🙏 よろしくお願いします!

1 [ ]内の語を必要があれば適切な形にして,英文を完成させなさい。 (3) Taro runs (1) Japan is Ti smaller (2) I drank water as る) much. fastest (4) That camera is the most expensive る) more difficult. で す。 247 (5) Math is 2 日本語の意味に合うように,( 内に適切な語を入れなさい。 A than Australia. [small] as Cathy. [much] in my class. [ fast] of the three. [ expensive] than English for me. [difficult ] (1) これは,私の人生で私のおかしたずば抜けて一番ひどい過ちだ。 This is (by) (far ) the worst mistake I've ever made in my life. (2) 私のいとこのケイは私より16か月年少だ。 My cousin Kei is 16 (months) (older) (than) me. (3) 新しいモデルは、以前のものより3倍重い。 The new model is three(flmes) (as › cheavy ) as the former one. 3 下線部の表現に注意して、次の英文を日本語にしなさい。 (1) The sooner you finish, the earlier you can go home. 早く終えれば終えるほど、早く家に帰れる。 (2) Call your parents as soon as possible. できるだけ早く両親に電話しなさい。 (3) The older you get, the wiser you become, 19 is > 歳を取れば取るほど、賢くなる。 ]内の語を並べかえなさい。 4 日本語の意味に合うように,[ (1)燃料費は昨年の平均より19パーセント高い。 The cost of fuel is [ higher / percent / than / nineteen] the average last year. ABC The cost of fuel is nineteen percent higher tharine average last year. (2) 私はできるだけ静かにドアを閉めた。 | closed the door [as/as/ could / quietly/1]. I closed the door as quietly as I could. (3) 私のイヌはあなたのイヌほど人なつこくない。 My dog is [yours/friendly/not/as/as ]. My dog is not as friendly as yours (4) たくさんの情報を得ることができるほど、その問題をよりいっそうきちんと理解できる。 The more information you get, [ you / more / understand / clearly / the / can ] the subject. The more information you get, the more clearly you. the subject. can understand 23

解決済み 回答数: 2
英語 高校生

(3)お願いします。最小値がないということはこの式が単調増加であるということだと思うのですけど、これをどう使うのかわからないです

第2問 (必答問題)(配点15) 太郎さんと花子さんは、次の問題について話している。 (2) 問題 αを定数とする。リーザーα・3の最小値を求めよ。 花子 - イ ウ I αのとき、最小値は になると思うよ。 オ 4 太郎:ちょっと待って!alのときも4-1のときもだから (1) 太郎のグラフをかいたらどうなるのかな。 花子コンピュータソフトを使ってのときと1のときのグラフを かくと次のようになるね。 エ a=1のときも4-1のときも最小値は一 になるけれど、グ オ ラフを見ると1のときは最小値が存在しないはずだよね。 V/A k- イ ウ -α とする。 a=1のときの最小値を H とするのが誤りで オ ある理由として正しいものは である。 a=1のとき I 4-1のとき 太郎=1のときはgの最小値が存在するけれど,-1のときは最小値が 存在しないみたいだね。 最小値を求めるにはどうすればよいかな。 カ については、最も適当なものを、次の①~③のうちから一つ選べ。 ⑩t>0であり, 4-1 のときは となることはないから。 ① 1>0であり、a=1のときはt-kとなることはないから。 ② t<0であり、a=1のときは1=kとなることはないから。 1 <0であり, a=-1のときはt=kとなることはないから。 花子 : 3 とおきμをtの式で表してみよう。 ワンド t" とおくとは =ドー アat となる。 2 イ I a a² オム (数学 II, 数学 B. 数学C第2問は次ページに続く』 (3)yの最小値が存在しないとき,αのとり得る値の範囲は キ である。 キ の解答群 a>0 ① a≥O ③ a≤1 a <0 ② a<1 a≤0 (数学Ⅱ. 数学 B. 数学C第2間は次ページに続く。) -5-

解決済み 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

問4の⑤の計算はどうすれば合うのですか。 教えてください🙇‍♀️ 3枚目が答えです。

次の英文を読んで,下の設問に答えなさい。 Last year, 4.2 million babies died. That is the most recent number reported by UNICEF of deaths before the age of one, worldwide. We often see lonely and emotionally charged numbers like this in the news or in the materials of activist groups or organizations. They produce a reaction. Who can even imagine 4.2 million dead babies? It is so terrible, and even worse when we know that almost all died from easily preventable diseases. And how can anyone argue that 4.2 million is anything other than a huge number? You might think that nobody would even try to argue (that, but you would be wrong. That is exactly why I mentioned this number. Because it is not huge: it is beautifully small. If we even start to think about how tragic each of these deaths is for the parents who had waited for their newborn to smile, and walk, and play, and instead had to bury their baby, then this number could keep us crying for a long time. But who would be helped by these tears? Instead let's think clearly about human suffering. The number 4.2 million is for 2016. The year before, the number was 4.4 million. The year before that, it was 4.5 million. Back in 1950, it was 14.4 million. That's almost 10 million more dead babies per year, compared with today. Suddenly this terrible number starts to look smaller. In fact (2)the number has never been lower. Of course, I am the first person to wish the number was even lower and falling even faster. But to know how to act, and how to prioritize resources, nothing can be more important than doing the cool-headed math and realizing what works and what doesn't. And this is clear: more and more deaths are being prevented. comparing the numbers. (3). We would never realize that without

解決済み 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

赤い下線のところがどういう構造になっているか分からないです、教えてくださいm(_ _)m

moving from " (1) 点) There are historians and others who would like to make a neat division between "historical facts" and "values." The trouble is that values even enter into deciding what count as facts-there is a big leap involved in 'raw data" to a judgement of fact. More important, one finds that the more complex and multi-levelled the history is, and the more important the issues it raises for today, the less it is possible to sustain a fact-value division. But this by no means implies that there has simply to be a conflict of prejudices and biases, as the data are manipulated to suit one worldview or another. What it does mean is that the self of the historian is an important factor. The historian is shaped by experiences, contexts, norms, values, and beliefs. When dealing with history, especially the sort of history that is of most significance in philosophy, that shaping is bound to be relevant. As far as possible it needs to be articulated and open to discussion. The best historians are well aware of this. They are alert to many dimensions of bias and to the endless (and therefore endlessly discussable) significance of their own horizons and presuppositions. A great deal can of course be learned from those who do not share our presuppositions. Our capacity to make wise, well-supported judgements in matters of historical fact and significance can only be formed over years of discussion with others, many of whom have very different horizons from our own. It is possible to I have a 12-year-old chess champion or mathematical or musical genius, but it is unimaginable that the world's greatest expert on Socrates could be that age. The difficulty is not just one of the time to assimilate information; it is (2)

解決済み 回答数: 1
1/81