学年

質問の種類

英語 高校生

英語に自信がある人回答づくりお願いします! ※書き込みは気にしないでください。 これプラス、問題に続きがあって、 問5 本文には、実物の動物を見ることによって人々がより深く理解できることが3つ書かれています。それらを日本語で答えなさい。 問6 本文には、動物園... 続きを読む

第4問 次の英文を読んで、 設問に答えなさい。①~6は段落番号です。 黒体 6) のIn my view, (1)it_is perfectly possible for many species of animals living in gon.. ie parks to have a quality of life as high as, or higher than, in the wild. 'Animals in ood z0os get a varied and high-quality diet with all the supplements required. and anv 1pesses they might have will be treated.Their movement might be somewhat restricted. mt they have a safe environment in which to live, and they are spared bullying and social 神年 predators*2 or the irritation and pain of parasites or injuries. The average captive animal racism*1 by others of their kind. They do not suffer from the threat or stress of will have a greater life expectancy compared with its wild counterpart, and will not die of drought, of starvation or in the jaws of a predator. Alot of very nasty things happen to truly wild' animals that simply don't happen in good zoos, and to view a life that is 'free' as 術保者一 one that is automatically ‘good' is, I think, an error. Furthermore, zoos serve several key purposes. の Firstly, zoos aid conservation. Colossal numbers of species are becoming extinct across the world, and many more are increasingly threatened and therefore risk extinction. Moreover, some of these collapses have been sudden, dramatic and unexpected, or were simply discovered very late in the day. Aspecies protected in captivity can be bred up to provide a reservoir*3 population against a population crash or extinction in the wild. A good number of species only exist in captivity, with many ofthese livinginzoos. Stillmore only exist in the wildbecause they have been reintroduced from zoos, or have wild populations that have been1o0osted by captive bred animals Without (2these efforts there would be fewer species alive today. Although reintroduction successes are few and far between*4, the numbers are increasing, and the very fact that species have been saved or reintroduced as a result of captive breeding proves the value of such initiatives. ③ Zoos alsoprovide education. Many children and adults, especially those in cities, will never see a wild animal beyond a fox or pigeon. While it is true that television documentaries are becoming ever more detailed and impressive, and many natural history specimens are on display in museums, there really is nothing to compare with seeinga living creature in the flesh*5, hearing it, smelling it, watching what it does and having the time to absorb details. That alone will bring a greater understanding and perspective to many, and hopefully give them a greater appreciation for wildlife, conservation efforts and how they can contribute. ④ Inaddition to this, there isalsothe education that cantake place in Z0Osthrough signs, talks and presentations which directly communicate information to visitors about the animals they are seeing and their place in the world. This was an area where zoos used to be lacking, but they are now increasingly sophisticated in their communication and 8.

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

英語に自信がある人回答づくりお願いします! ※書き込みは気にしないでください。 これプラス、問題に続きがあって、 問5 本文には、実物の動物を見ることによって人々がより深く理解できることが3つ書かれています。それらを日本語で答えなさい。 問6 本文には、動物園... 続きを読む

第4問 次の英文を読んで、 設問に答えなさい。①~6は段落番号です。 黒体 6) のIn my view, (1)it_is perfectly possible for many species of animals living in gon.. ie parks to have a quality of life as high as, or higher than, in the wild. 'Animals in ood z0os get a varied and high-quality diet with all the supplements required. and anv 1pesses they might have will be treated.Their movement might be somewhat restricted. mt they have a safe environment in which to live, and they are spared bullying and social 神年 predators*2 or the irritation and pain of parasites or injuries. The average captive animal racism*1 by others of their kind. They do not suffer from the threat or stress of will have a greater life expectancy compared with its wild counterpart, and will not die of drought, of starvation or in the jaws of a predator. Alot of very nasty things happen to truly wild' animals that simply don't happen in good zoos, and to view a life that is 'free' as 術保者一 one that is automatically ‘good' is, I think, an error. Furthermore, zoos serve several key purposes. の Firstly, zoos aid conservation. Colossal numbers of species are becoming extinct across the world, and many more are increasingly threatened and therefore risk extinction. Moreover, some of these collapses have been sudden, dramatic and unexpected, or were simply discovered very late in the day. Aspecies protected in captivity can be bred up to provide a reservoir*3 population against a population crash or extinction in the wild. A good number of species only exist in captivity, with many ofthese livinginzoos. Stillmore only exist in the wildbecause they have been reintroduced from zoos, or have wild populations that have been1o0osted by captive bred animals Without (2these efforts there would be fewer species alive today. Although reintroduction successes are few and far between*4, the numbers are increasing, and the very fact that species have been saved or reintroduced as a result of captive breeding proves the value of such initiatives. ③ Zoos alsoprovide education. Many children and adults, especially those in cities, will never see a wild animal beyond a fox or pigeon. While it is true that television documentaries are becoming ever more detailed and impressive, and many natural history specimens are on display in museums, there really is nothing to compare with seeinga living creature in the flesh*5, hearing it, smelling it, watching what it does and having the time to absorb details. That alone will bring a greater understanding and perspective to many, and hopefully give them a greater appreciation for wildlife, conservation efforts and how they can contribute. ④ Inaddition to this, there isalsothe education that cantake place in Z0Osthrough signs, talks and presentations which directly communicate information to visitors about the animals they are seeing and their place in the world. This was an area where zoos used to be lacking, but they are now increasingly sophisticated in their communication and 8.

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

答え→4、4、3、1、2で合ってると思いますか⁇ 違うと思ったらどこがどう違うのか教えて欲しいです‼︎お願いします🤲

u an article to help you prepare for te jsh teacher gaVe 9 e co Englisl ith one of the comment S Your part O debate in the next class. 信 is shown beloW- 1のせこ ild's Roomn uorv @ amoe Of Chil Signifit By Cathy Becker | | | | s friends to their own room, | hild with a shared room. | 1 f this article Wr son said,“Tf a child invite: 品 than 8C de when 8 friend visits." Johnson | gs children | sharing 8 TOOT brin in reality is the opposite. The | Doctor Johni theyTl learn about manners faste Also, it give them a SenSe of pri also said, Many parents used to feel closer. Howeyer。 we know now that 8 ッ ]ack of personal SDace CauS8 conflict and argument8. | | Tn other words, children that have their own roomm are better at | nandling responsibility and mature 8OOn6r than children that dont. They can customize and choose what they want in their roorn。 glving hem control over their environment that teaches them about control and decision making. It also gives them: Self-confidenee, which is crucial for a child. It seems to be a comnmon trend to give them their own roonn as early in their childhood as possible. On the other hand, not all parentS agTee・ One parent said, “Contrary to recent popular belief, there are advantages to sharing 8 room. Children will learn to 匠6goti8te and commpromise Another parent added, “By sharing 8 rOOm children will draw a lne and take ownership of their belongings, Which is great for character building. Also, it helps them accept others and their differences.“ @ CommentS Ajieia Grant 了have 2 daughters and they share a room at the moment、One is neat and the oher js messy, so theyre always arguing! Were thinkmg ot

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

丸は気にしないでください(><) 答え教えていただけると嬉しいです😭

間 JH OUT culture, where the use ot dictionaries 1S WideSDread。many people may have the impression that a word's meaning is simply its dictionary definition.A little thought should show however, that there must be more to meaning than this. It is true that when someone wants to find out what き Word means, an easy and practical way to do it is to look the word up ina dicionary. Most people in our caltare accept dictionaries as providing unauestionably authoritative accounts of the meanings of the words they define. [2] Thenoleof dictionaries/ in our society as authorities on meaning 1eads many people to feel that the dicionary dehnition of a word more accurately represents the word's meaning than does an individual speaker's nderstanding of the word. Keep in mind/ however。 that the people who write dictionaries arrive at their definitions by studying the ways speakers of the language use different words. Some dictionaries are relatively prescriptive\、 others more descriptive* but all must face the fact that a word means what people use it to mean。 There simply is no higher authority than the general community of native speakers of the language. This is obyiously the position one must take in descriptive analysis、 but even in prescriptive grammar, words cannot be given strange defimitions that dont correspond to actual uses of those words by the speech community. A word's meaning is determined by the people who use that word, not by a dictionary- [3] The iqea that a dictionary definition is all there is to a word's meaning runs into even more serious problems when one considers that im order to understand the dictionary definition of a word, one must know the meanings of the words used in that definition: For example. 下 the word ecfo7xere is defined as 'a blastomere that develops into ectoderm'、one must ee he 0 Me 0 Pd Side

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

答え教えてください

Mookzemcmwearょうに の Tem benowr PT my rh moee eround the eunr の @ mr sm S Ar sm jet the eerth Ne am 9 @ wwatoher Diyou buy thie beeyeaterdeyr thet bag ーー PT the day betom (0 ぐ Hesaito wm"Plemse dont make noieer @ Re 5 ーー memke noieer rcienoe [回 のEXを郭んで。 あとの各問いに答えよ。 We dlame history, the glory of the past。 more ofeen under fichion than ud ー iri mumt be afnhated with one or the other。 TFnok that ia hmtory ia lowe rewt somewhere in betveen the two main divisiops of the kinds of books then 革 "mually admitted that history ia cfoser to fction than to ecionee This does not mean that a historimn moAes up his factsr hke a poet or story teler However we might get into trouble iTwe insisted too strongly that a writer of fction pkes up んis facts He creates aworid。 But this new world is no totaly diierent fom our own 一 indeed, had better not be 一 and a poetis an ordinary man。 with grdinary senees by and through which he has enrned. He does not see things that We annot see (he may see better or in a shightly different way)。 Hi charactere use wordml that we use (ofherwise we could not behieve in them) 。 It is only in dreams that human beingm create really strange new worids 一 yet even in the most fantastic dream the events and creatures of the imagination are made up out of elements of everyday experience. They are merely put together in strange new ways 人 good historian does not, of course, make up the past. He considers himself responsibly bound by some concept or oriterion of aceuracy or facts. Nevertheless。it is 3mportant to remember that the historian must alvays make up something. 。He reteither fnd a generel pattern in_ or impoee one on events: or he must LE jp kaors why the pereone jn hia story did the things they did。 He may have as genaral theoryorphiosophyr euch as fhat Provadence les human atiare。and make hishistory 硬 hat Orhe may abjure an such pattern imposed as it were from the outside or

回答募集中 回答数: 0