学年

質問の種類

英語 高校生

解説の1番最初に同じ形〜とありますがそれはどういうことでしょうか?

Les 次の英文を Chw reality years. The and annoye again and s The an see it. We do so it is perception: possible ac senses a process int then exper therefore of the num process sig of our brai our brain's 方 発音する / way beginner [] 初級者、初心者/exception 例外/2 pronounce [動] 法 / make oneself understood 人の考えを理解してもらう (直訳「人の言っているこ と)を理解される状態にする」→「人の考えを理解してもらう, 話が通じる」となりま す)/considerable たくさんの/* diverse 圏 さまざまな、多様な/background 名 背 環境/* conscientious 誠実な真面目な/meet a need ニーズを満たす、要求に 応える / feedback 反応 (参考) 意見/aspect圏観点 / on a regular basis 定期的に *consistently 一貫して/indicate示す / be pleased with ~~に満足している ' devise 考案する / assignment 課題/ encourage 人 to 原形 人に~するよう に促す 推奨する/ advise 人 of ~ 人に~を伝達する/community-based 形 地域密着 型の/facility 施設設備/report 報告する 業に発音指導を取り入れ始 ドバックで目立たなくなっ て彼女の初級クラスに出る。 ラスはときに,現在の受講 るようになりつつあるとに ' gradually [] だん 文法・構文 be keen to 原形 / how to 原形という直前の文と同じ形が使われており、ど ちらも「英語を話せるようになりたいと思っている」 という内容です。 このように同じ形 の反復は同じ意味になります (Rule 25p.103)。 a colleague of ours は, a friend of mine 「友人のうちの1人」 と同じ構造で、「私たちの同僚のうちの1人」という意味です (文章で初出の場合は,まだ特定されていないのでmy colleague や my friend とは言わない 場合が多いです)。 "At first 「初めは」は、「初めは~だった。 だけど・・・」という形で後 ろに but や however が続くことが多いです。 今回も次の文の冒頭でHowever が使われてい ますね。 ちなみに 後半のandは動名詞のカタマリ2つ (devising と advising~)を結 んでいます。 〈these + 名詞〉は「まとめ表現」です。 直前の内容がわからなくても 「授 業に変化を加えた」 のだと推測できます。 oqqo gniesomni bogswoona fari] ainomngian 2 'Vicki (gradually) came to understand (that (what the students (really) wanted o> was not an increased opportunity [to speak], but explicit instruction [on how to speak〕 (that is), explicit instruction [in pronunciation]〉. She realized she had been avoiding (actually) teaching pronunciation how to go about it)). 3 (Once she was (a little) unsure (because she os (v) V (o) instruction 指導/on 音/2go about ~~に" 度、かつて」と区別して ~ もはや~ない / feat かつての/attend 2 あふれかえる/be 文法・構文 漢方 2 be unsur ますが,後ろに what は 「接続詞」 で, On much so that ~は「 SV 構文 「とても〜 で」という意味 ( に移っていた前の め、和訳では「そ learning to speak いう意味です(「 1 (When ter (seemingl

解決済み 回答数: 1
英語 中学生

(4)合っていますか? 15行目くらいからだと思います

次の英文を読んで,(1)~(5)の問いに答えなさい。 Takashi visited Mr. Paul in London during spring vacation. famous places in London with Mr. Paul. He stayed at Mr. Paul's house. Takashi went to some One day, Takashi wanted to visit other places near London by himself and he told Mr. Paul about it. Mr. Paul said, "Go to Brighton. The city is very beautiful, so it's Takashi read the timetable many times and he (visit) by many people." station at s He looked at the clock in the planned to take a train at 8:40 in the morning. He arrived at the He sat on a chair and looked around him. Then he felt that something was wrong/ station building. It was 9:30. 8:30. But Takashi was very surprised, so he looked at his watch, but it was still 8:30. He found an old woman and asked, She looked at her watch and answered, "It's 8:30." He was relieved. suddenly, the old woman said to him again, "Oh, sorry. It's summer time now. 7.It started yesterday, so it's 9:30 10 "Excuse me, but what time is it now ?" now.' But just then her train came, so she stopped the conversation and ⑤( get) on the train. He went to Brighton. He enjoyed the city very much. Takashi didn't understand. took the next train at 9:40 and Takashi took a train back to London in the evening. He told Mr. Paul about his conversation with the old woman at the station. Mr. Paul laughed. Takashi asked, "What's summer time?" Mr. Paul said, "We have long daytime in summer. 15 From the end of March to the end of October, we put the clock forward an hour and then back again in fall. We do it to use the daytime more usefully. There are some good points, but also some problems." Takashi thought it was interesting. Mr. Paul said, "I want you to learn more about summer time." "I will," Takashi answered. After he came back to Japan, he went to the library and read a book about summer time.

解決済み 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

赤い下線のところがどういう構造になっているか分からないです、教えてくださいm(_ _)m

moving from " (1) 点) There are historians and others who would like to make a neat division between "historical facts" and "values." The trouble is that values even enter into deciding what count as facts-there is a big leap involved in 'raw data" to a judgement of fact. More important, one finds that the more complex and multi-levelled the history is, and the more important the issues it raises for today, the less it is possible to sustain a fact-value division. But this by no means implies that there has simply to be a conflict of prejudices and biases, as the data are manipulated to suit one worldview or another. What it does mean is that the self of the historian is an important factor. The historian is shaped by experiences, contexts, norms, values, and beliefs. When dealing with history, especially the sort of history that is of most significance in philosophy, that shaping is bound to be relevant. As far as possible it needs to be articulated and open to discussion. The best historians are well aware of this. They are alert to many dimensions of bias and to the endless (and therefore endlessly discussable) significance of their own horizons and presuppositions. A great deal can of course be learned from those who do not share our presuppositions. Our capacity to make wise, well-supported judgements in matters of historical fact and significance can only be formed over years of discussion with others, many of whom have very different horizons from our own. It is possible to I have a 12-year-old chess champion or mathematical or musical genius, but it is unimaginable that the world's greatest expert on Socrates could be that age. The difficulty is not just one of the time to assimilate information; it is (2)

解決済み 回答数: 1