-
![]()
s not something you Want 9
eir horme5・ It*
8 。 tak eople out of th 村 K
you are ga ing 1 other than definitely needing to 9" 叶 dose
』 do lightIy , for 「@d rter to taKe shelter・ 1f is a plum,
radiation・ Tn S0TTe accldents, IE 15 DTP indows 2 d
or puf人 relea5e, people shelter In hou5e5 witl nt
いい rhead2/" 58yS・
the puff has passed overheady Milligan 58Y :
NeceSsarY changeS?
In Japan, even the wake of the deadIy earthquake and ME d
i ins25 We
left local infrastructure ruin5, thousands of people た 抽 ta
from the vicinity of the nuclear POWeT plant within 24 hourS・ MM 3
Milligan, dt least, does not anticipate anY chan9ges to the「Uu e5 ー し
from27 less0nS learned from Fukushimaa ro
nuclear DOWe「 plants stemmin9
now Provide adequate? ion for public| ww
e Can See i
ゞThe planning ZOneS in place
There IS nothing W
cate that We would need to expand、 zio
る le
health and safety,′ She SayS・
Fukushima meltdowns that would indi
the_.plume eXxDOSU「 pathway“"
an aircra介 mi
ar
USS Ronald Rea9
gase5?1 On ah
dioactIVe noble
e aircraft carrier found ほぼ:
s for civilianS, after
miles from the plant|
e case of Fukushirma, the
carrier? sailed into the plume of escaping「す
March 12. More than 100 miles aWay, sailors on th
jevels high enough to exceed the EPA'Sデ guideline
zo roughly 10 hours of exposure. "They went up to 130
and we were St reading a direct gamma shine33 of 0.6 milirem pe 因
nour” explained the NRCS Stephen Trautman on March 12, according t9
s34. Garmma「ayS d「e among the most energetic 一 and tnerefore
forms of radiation.
Nevertheless, in th
transcript
dangerous tO health 一
2。 Tn the end, the question i5 One of risk. No one has died from radioactiwe
contamination as a result of the Fukushima meltdowns, at least not yeW
And it may prove impossible to disentangle3* any extra cancers due 0
Fukushima S radiation, from those that happen as a result of all the othW
carcinogenic37 factors a DerSOn is exposed to in the modern world froW
diet to smoke.
But it remai i
jns unclear how far radioactive emissions3 might reach In WW
Case of a
another 0 央0 1 Fukushima. "At that point its from We
? Another five miles? Another 10 miles? Do you 8
a Sense?” ask 1]
Sked NRC chairman Gregory Jaczko on March 12, as he
t
his staff anal
yzed computer modeling of a catastrophic meltdown
す
