学年

質問の種類

TOEIC・英語 大学生・専門学校生・社会人

この長文問題の答えと解説をお願いします。

15 語数: 398 語 出題校 法政大 5 We are already aware that our every move online is tracked and analyzed. But you 2-53 couldn't have known how much Facebook can learn about you from the smallest of social interactions - a 'like'*. (1) Researchers from the University of Cambridge designed (2) a simple machine-learning 2-54 system to predict Facebook users' personal information based solely on which pages they had liked. E "We were completely surprised by the accuracy of the predictions," says Michael 2-55 Kosinski, lead researcher of the project. Kosinski and colleagues built the system by scanning likes for a sample of 58,000 volunteers, and matching them up with other 10 profile details such as age, gender, and relationship status. They also matched up those likes with the results of personality and intelligence tests the volunteers had taken. The team then used their model to make predictions about other volunteers, based solely on their likes. The system can distinguish between the profiles of black and white Facebook users, 15 getting it right 95 percent of the time. It was also 90 percent accurate in separating males and females, Democrats and Republicans. Personality traits like openness and intelligence were also estimated based on likes, and were as accurate in some areas as a standard personality test designed for the task. Mixing what a user likes with many kinds of other data from their real-life activities could improve these predictions even more. 20 Voting records, utility bills and marriage records are already being added to Facebook's database, where they are easier to analyze. Facebook recently partnered with offline data companies, which all collect this kind of information. This move will allow even deeper insights into the behavior of the web users. 25 30 (3) - Sarah Downey, a lawyer and analyst with a privacy technology company, foresees insurers using the information gained by Facebook to help them identify risky customers, and perhaps charge them with higher fees. But there are potential benefits for users, too. Kosinski suggests that Facebook could end up as an online locker for your personal information, releasing your profiles at your command to help you with career planning. Downey says the research is the first solid example of the kinds of insights that can be made through Facebook. "This study is a great example of how the little things you do online show so much about you,” she says. "You might not remember liking things, " but Facebook remembers and (4) it all adds up.", * a 'like': フェイスブック上で個人の好みを表示する機能。 日本語版のフェイスブックでは「いいね!」 と表記される。 2-56 2-57 2-58 36

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

赤線引っ張ってあるところの訳し方が分かりません。 この部分が何を修飾してるのかも分からなくて、文法的にしっかり成り立っているのかも分かりません。 orの役割が重要なのでしょうか? どなたか教えてください🙇🏻‍♀️

形式主語 (後ろの不定詞を指す) it is (nearly) impossible (for countries) [to hide their activities], and anyone can speak ほとんど不可能に近い 国々にとって 自らの活動を隠すことは (about crimes) (to a global audience). そして誰でも語ることができる 犯罪について 世界中の視聴者に (1.08)3 【注意点】 ソーシャルメディアの危険性が述べられている。 [段落要旨 一方で、ソーシャ But digitalization has a dark side. Social media, (like Twitter and Facebook), (often) ルメディアを通じ て不正確な情報 が広まる危険性が ある。 しかしデジタル化は 暗黒面を持つ ソーシャルメディアはツイッターやフェイスブックのような (代) しばしば 【注】 long before... =…のずっと前に release information (to the public) (that has not been checked), or (long before a reliable 情報を公開する 一般大衆に 検証されていない あるいはずっと前に信頼できる Ma = information 形式主語(後ろの不定詞を指す) news organization would release it). (So), it is possible (for inaccurate information) [to spread quickly]. 報道機関が情報を公開するよりも だから可能性がある 不正確な情報が 落要旨 あるカナダ人男性 (1.12) 4 【具体例】 あるカナダ人男性が偽の情報で被害を受けた例が示されている。 Take the case of a Canadian man 〈named Veerender Jubbal〉〉. Several European ソーシャルメデ ア上の偽の情報 大きな迷惑を被 した。 ケースを取り上げてみよう カナダ人男性の ヴィーレンダー・ジュバルという名の ヨーロッパの数社の 急速に広まる news organizations named him (as a suspect <for the November 2015 Paris terror attack〉). 報道機関が こと 彼を名指しした 容疑者として 2015年11月のパリへのテロ攻撃の 意味上の主語+動名詞 They (even) published a photo 〈of him wearing a vest 〈with bombs attached to it〉〉. それらの機関は写真を掲載さえした 彼がベストを着ている Q5爆弾がそれに取り付けられた して い」 But Mr. Jubbal was (completely) innocent. Someone had changed a photol

未解決 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

赤線引っ張ってあるところの訳し方が分かりません。 この部分が何を修飾してるのかも分からなくて、文法的にしっかり成り立っているのかも分かりません。 orの役割が重要なのでしょうか? どなたか教えてください🙇🏻‍♀️

形式主語 (後ろの不定詞を指す) it is (nearly) impossible (for countries) [to hide their activities], and anyone can speak ほとんど不可能に近い 国々にとって 自らの活動を隠すことは (about crimes) (to a global audience). そして誰でも語ることができる 犯罪について 世界中の視聴者に (1.08)3 【注意点】 ソーシャルメディアの危険性が述べられている。 [段落要旨 一方で、ソーシャ But digitalization has a dark side. Social media, (like Twitter and Facebook), (often) ルメディアを通じ て不正確な情報 が広まる危険性が ある。 しかしデジタル化は 暗黒面を持つ ソーシャルメディアはツイッターやフェイスブックのような (代) しばしば 【注】 long before... =…のずっと前に release information (to the public) (that has not been checked), or (long before a reliable 情報を公開する 一般大衆に 検証されていない あるいはずっと前に信頼できる Ma = information 形式主語(後ろの不定詞を指す) news organization would release it). (So), it is possible (for inaccurate information) [to spread quickly]. 報道機関が情報を公開するよりも だから可能性がある 不正確な情報が 落要旨 あるカナダ人男性 (1.12) 4 【具体例】 あるカナダ人男性が偽の情報で被害を受けた例が示されている。 Take the case of a Canadian man 〈named Veerender Jubbal〉〉. Several European ソーシャルメデ ア上の偽の情報 大きな迷惑を被 した。 ケースを取り上げてみよう カナダ人男性の ヴィーレンダー・ジュバルという名の ヨーロッパの数社の 急速に広まる news organizations named him (as a suspect <for the November 2015 Paris terror attack〉). 報道機関が こと 彼を名指しした 容疑者として 2015年11月のパリへのテロ攻撃の 意味上の主語+動名詞 They (even) published a photo 〈of him wearing a vest 〈with bombs attached to it〉〉. それらの機関は写真を掲載さえした 彼がベストを着ている Q5爆弾がそれに取り付けられた して い」 But Mr. Jubbal was (completely) innocent. Someone had changed a photol

未解決 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

カッコで囲んだとこの英文の1つ目のandからの訳がどうして2枚目のようになるのか教えてください。 2枚目のどんな疑問が重要か〜の次のとこからです

ample practices varied across time and place. The truth is that we about what preliterate societies knew or believed. But they left behind *. evidence of their attention to the movements of the Sun and the phases of the Moon. And we can be sure that whatever questions they asked of the heavens were very different from those that motivate space exploration today. (A) rotic othe In reality, the difference between ancient and modern knowledge systems is more qualitative than quantitative; it is not about how much is known, but about what questions are important and about the acceptable ways of asking and answering those questions. And while we may not easily be able to slip between our modern worldview and those of others, we can nonetheless attempt to do so by asking not what ancient people knew about the world, but what their questions were when they looked at it. If we do this in the case of Mars, examining a few of the earliest known examples from around the world, we can see how sky knowledge was considered important to the functioning of the state whether it was *astrological knowledge in the service of good governance, or knowledge of bloodlines and relationships with the gods and other sky entities, which was used (B) - verdd

回答募集中 回答数: 0
1/50