学年

質問の種類

英語 高校生

赤線部分についてです。私は「any species」を「いかなる種」と訳したのですが、日本語訳や解説を見るに、"any species"は"a species"という意味を表してるそうです。今までanyにひとつの物を限定するイメージを持っておらず、調べてもあまり理解できなか... 続きを読む

2 Unit 20-Cognitive Linguistics- | 519 words / 筑波大 1 識別 One of the most important things that language does for us is help us make distinctions. implicitly, automatically all other When we call something edible, we distinguish it from - R オ 2 5 things that are inedible. When we call something a fruit, we necessarily distinguish it from vegetables, meat, dairy, and so on. 初期の人 組織した。彼らの精神と 基本的な私たちがまた 有効的に ② (1) Early humans organized their minds and thoughts around basic distinctions/that we still make and find useful. One of the earliest distinctions made was between now/and not-now; / these things are happening in the moment these other things happened in the past and are now in my memory. No other species makes this self-conscious distinction among past, present, and future. Of course many species respond to time by building nests, flying south, hibernating", 10 mating but these are preprogrammed, instinctive behaviors and these actions are not the 物体の永抂 result of conscious decision, meditation, or planning. 13 Simultaneous with an understanding of now versus before is one of (2) object permanence: Something may not be in my immediate view, but that does not mean it has ceased to exist. Our 存在をつかむではない? 何かはすぐには見えないかも brains represent objects that are here-and-now as the information comes in from our sensory 2 15 receptors For example, we see a deer and we know through our eyes that the deer is standing n& right before us! When the deer is gone we can remember its image and represent it in our mind's eve, or even represent it externally by drawing or painting or sculpting it. Jon 上の 4 This human capacity to distinguish the here-and-now from the here-and-not-now.showed up 初の記校 なだがここにあって、何がここにあったか at least 50,000 years ago in cave paintings. (3) These constitute the first evidence of any species on 芝援 識別 ひきる 120 earth being able to explicitly represent the distinction between what is here and what was here. In as other words those early cave-dwelling Picassos, through the very act of painting, were making a distinction about time and place and objects, an advanced cognitive operation we now call mental representation* And what they were demonstrating was an articulated sense of time: There was a deer out there (not here on the cave wall of course). He is not there now, but he was there before. 25 Now and before are different; here (the cave wall) is merely representing there (the meadow in front of the cave). This prehistoric step in the organization of our minds mattered a great deal. 5 In making such distinctions, (4) we are implicitly forming categories, something that is often す overlooked The formation of categories in humans is guided by a cognitive principle of wanting 多くの何報をできる! 325 h to encode as much information as possible with the least possible effort. Categorization systems optimize* the ease of conception and the importance of being able to communicate about those hibernate 冬眠する sensory receptor: 感覚受容器 (体の周囲の環境情報を感知する受容器の総称。 目、鼻、耳など) cognitive : 認識の mental representation 的表象(例えば人が「イヌ」を考えるとき、それは頭の中で文字でも映像でも 音でもない 何らかの形で思い描かれるが,この「頭の中の記号」のことを心的表象という) encode:・・・を記号化する optimize ... を最大限にする permeate : ・・・ に広がる 英 6 音

解決済み 回答数: 2
英語 高校生

問4の⑤の計算はどうすれば合うのですか。 教えてください🙇‍♀️ 3枚目が答えです。

次の英文を読んで,下の設問に答えなさい。 Last year, 4.2 million babies died. That is the most recent number reported by UNICEF of deaths before the age of one, worldwide. We often see lonely and emotionally charged numbers like this in the news or in the materials of activist groups or organizations. They produce a reaction. Who can even imagine 4.2 million dead babies? It is so terrible, and even worse when we know that almost all died from easily preventable diseases. And how can anyone argue that 4.2 million is anything other than a huge number? You might think that nobody would even try to argue (that, but you would be wrong. That is exactly why I mentioned this number. Because it is not huge: it is beautifully small. If we even start to think about how tragic each of these deaths is for the parents who had waited for their newborn to smile, and walk, and play, and instead had to bury their baby, then this number could keep us crying for a long time. But who would be helped by these tears? Instead let's think clearly about human suffering. The number 4.2 million is for 2016. The year before, the number was 4.4 million. The year before that, it was 4.5 million. Back in 1950, it was 14.4 million. That's almost 10 million more dead babies per year, compared with today. Suddenly this terrible number starts to look smaller. In fact (2)the number has never been lower. Of course, I am the first person to wish the number was even lower and falling even faster. But to know how to act, and how to prioritize resources, nothing can be more important than doing the cool-headed math and realizing what works and what doesn't. And this is clear: more and more deaths are being prevented. comparing the numbers. (3). We would never realize that without

解決済み 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

下から2行目のto seeのtoは結果を表すtoでしょうか?

目標時間 ■2分19秒 音声 noitqmurenos baya 1 Social norms are unwritten rules that govern the way that people behave within a society or group. These norms provide stability in the long run, preventing the society from decaying into chaos, and ensuring that even monumental change happens slowly. But they also 5 strongly influence individuals to conform to society. For instance, one study in the 1950s showed this very clearly. New students at a university were randomly assigned to live among either conservative students or liberal students. The researchers observed that these new students gradually adapted their values and beliefs over time to fit the 10 norms of their surroundings. 2 Other studies have shown that people followed group norms even when they had direct evidence that contradicted the norm. For example, in one study, people were asked to estimate the length of a line drawn on a piece of paper. People's estimates followed a group norm Soini insmye daug goland that the group 15 even in cases when people could see with their own eyes was wrong. 301 10 aniq 3 Social norms often stifle creativity in groups. To the extent that creativity is the result of "thinking outside the box," groups do not normally reward creative individuals, but instead ignore them or 20 even push them out of the group completely. This often works to the businesses who strive to attract creative talent to detriment of many their organization only to see them become unproductive under the pressure of conformance to norms. To O do (233 words) bonaq otaqisins 125 St.

解決済み 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

赤線引っ張ってあるところの訳し方が分かりません。 この部分が何を修飾してるのかも分からなくて、文法的にしっかり成り立っているのかも分かりません。 orの役割が重要なのでしょうか? どなたか教えてください🙇🏻‍♀️

形式主語 (後ろの不定詞を指す) it is (nearly) impossible (for countries) [to hide their activities], and anyone can speak ほとんど不可能に近い 国々にとって 自らの活動を隠すことは (about crimes) (to a global audience). そして誰でも語ることができる 犯罪について 世界中の視聴者に (1.08)3 【注意点】 ソーシャルメディアの危険性が述べられている。 [段落要旨 一方で、ソーシャ But digitalization has a dark side. Social media, (like Twitter and Facebook), (often) ルメディアを通じ て不正確な情報 が広まる危険性が ある。 しかしデジタル化は 暗黒面を持つ ソーシャルメディアはツイッターやフェイスブックのような (代) しばしば 【注】 long before... =…のずっと前に release information (to the public) (that has not been checked), or (long before a reliable 情報を公開する 一般大衆に 検証されていない あるいはずっと前に信頼できる Ma = information 形式主語(後ろの不定詞を指す) news organization would release it). (So), it is possible (for inaccurate information) [to spread quickly]. 報道機関が情報を公開するよりも だから可能性がある 不正確な情報が 落要旨 あるカナダ人男性 (1.12) 4 【具体例】 あるカナダ人男性が偽の情報で被害を受けた例が示されている。 Take the case of a Canadian man 〈named Veerender Jubbal〉〉. Several European ソーシャルメデ ア上の偽の情報 大きな迷惑を被 した。 ケースを取り上げてみよう カナダ人男性の ヴィーレンダー・ジュバルという名の ヨーロッパの数社の 急速に広まる news organizations named him (as a suspect <for the November 2015 Paris terror attack〉). 報道機関が こと 彼を名指しした 容疑者として 2015年11月のパリへのテロ攻撃の 意味上の主語+動名詞 They (even) published a photo 〈of him wearing a vest 〈with bombs attached to it〉〉. それらの機関は写真を掲載さえした 彼がベストを着ている Q5爆弾がそれに取り付けられた して い」 But Mr. Jubbal was (completely) innocent. Someone had changed a photol

未解決 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

赤線引っ張ってあるところの訳し方が分かりません。 この部分が何を修飾してるのかも分からなくて、文法的にしっかり成り立っているのかも分かりません。 orの役割が重要なのでしょうか? どなたか教えてください🙇🏻‍♀️

形式主語 (後ろの不定詞を指す) it is (nearly) impossible (for countries) [to hide their activities], and anyone can speak ほとんど不可能に近い 国々にとって 自らの活動を隠すことは (about crimes) (to a global audience). そして誰でも語ることができる 犯罪について 世界中の視聴者に (1.08)3 【注意点】 ソーシャルメディアの危険性が述べられている。 [段落要旨 一方で、ソーシャ But digitalization has a dark side. Social media, (like Twitter and Facebook), (often) ルメディアを通じ て不正確な情報 が広まる危険性が ある。 しかしデジタル化は 暗黒面を持つ ソーシャルメディアはツイッターやフェイスブックのような (代) しばしば 【注】 long before... =…のずっと前に release information (to the public) (that has not been checked), or (long before a reliable 情報を公開する 一般大衆に 検証されていない あるいはずっと前に信頼できる Ma = information 形式主語(後ろの不定詞を指す) news organization would release it). (So), it is possible (for inaccurate information) [to spread quickly]. 報道機関が情報を公開するよりも だから可能性がある 不正確な情報が 落要旨 あるカナダ人男性 (1.12) 4 【具体例】 あるカナダ人男性が偽の情報で被害を受けた例が示されている。 Take the case of a Canadian man 〈named Veerender Jubbal〉〉. Several European ソーシャルメデ ア上の偽の情報 大きな迷惑を被 した。 ケースを取り上げてみよう カナダ人男性の ヴィーレンダー・ジュバルという名の ヨーロッパの数社の 急速に広まる news organizations named him (as a suspect <for the November 2015 Paris terror attack〉). 報道機関が こと 彼を名指しした 容疑者として 2015年11月のパリへのテロ攻撃の 意味上の主語+動名詞 They (even) published a photo 〈of him wearing a vest 〈with bombs attached to it〉〉. それらの機関は写真を掲載さえした 彼がベストを着ている Q5爆弾がそれに取り付けられた して い」 But Mr. Jubbal was (completely) innocent. Someone had changed a photol

未解決 回答数: 1
1/21