Subjectsがどうして被写体になるのか理解できないです

■e believes / that taking photos of people in their clothes / might 女は思っています 民族衣装を着た人の写真を撮ることは following generations. // 世代に。 wever, it was difficult / to take good photos / at first.// 良い写真を撮ることが は 困難でした 初めは 彼 e trust / between a photographer and their subjects / is imp 大切で 写真家と被写体との間の ney don't trust a photographer,/ they will not show / who は写真家を信頼しないと, 見せようとはしません in their trust/ she behaved / as if she were an African 信頼を得るために, 彼女はふるまいました 自分がアフリカの女性で ore the same costume, / ate the same meals,/ and put 同じ食事をし、 そし 同じ衣装を着て

共通する英単語が何か分かりません。どなたか教えていただきたいです。😭

(i) the facts or objects that make you believe something is true: There is convincing (e lung cancer. ) of a link between smoking and (ii) the information that is used in court to try to prove something: The suspect was released when the judge ruled there was no (e ) against him.

英語構文春A-K11 英文の構造の解説をお願いします🙇‍♀️

The rapid globalization of the economy has led to a more frequent interaction between diverse cultures than ever before, making the objective observation of cultural differences more essential for maintaining international harmony than the mere acquisition of language skills.

誤りがある英文を選ぶ問題なのですが、教えていただきたいです

(A) I'm sorry, I made a mistake in the calculation. (B) We need to do some research before launching the product. (C) She always does her best to satisfy her customers. (D) It's time to make a choice between the two options. (E) He promised to make a favor for me when I needed it.

赤線部分についてです。私は｢any species｣を｢いかなる種｣と訳したのですが、日本語訳や解説を見るに、"any species"は"a species"という意味を表してるそうです。今までanyにひとつの物を限定するイメージを持っておらず、調べてもあまり理解できなか... 続きを読む

2 Unit 20-Cognitive Linguistics- | 519 words / 筑波大 1 識別 One of the most important things that language does for us is help us make distinctions. implicitly, automatically all other When we call something edible, we distinguish it from - R オ 2 5 things that are inedible. When we call something a fruit, we necessarily distinguish it from vegetables, meat, dairy, and so on. 初期の人 組織した。彼らの精神と 基本的な私たちがまた 有効的に ② (1) Early humans organized their minds and thoughts around basic distinctions/that we still make and find useful. One of the earliest distinctions made was between now/and not-now; / these things are happening in the moment these other things happened in the past and are now in my memory. No other species makes this self-conscious distinction among past, present, and future. Of course many species respond to time by building nests, flying south, hibernating", 10 mating but these are preprogrammed, instinctive behaviors and these actions are not the 物体の永抂 result of conscious decision, meditation, or planning. 13 Simultaneous with an understanding of now versus before is one of (2) object permanence: Something may not be in my immediate view, but that does not mean it has ceased to exist. Our 存在をつかむではない? 何かはすぐには見えないかも brains represent objects that are here-and-now as the information comes in from our sensory 2 15 receptors For example, we see a deer and we know through our eyes that the deer is standing n& right before us! When the deer is gone we can remember its image and represent it in our mind's eve, or even represent it externally by drawing or painting or sculpting it. Jon 上の 4 This human capacity to distinguish the here-and-now from the here-and-not-now.showed up 初の記校 なだがここにあって、何がここにあったか at least 50,000 years ago in cave paintings. (3) These constitute the first evidence of any species on 芝援 識別 ひきる 120 earth being able to explicitly represent the distinction between what is here and what was here. In as other words those early cave-dwelling Picassos, through the very act of painting, were making a distinction about time and place and objects, an advanced cognitive operation we now call mental representation* And what they were demonstrating was an articulated sense of time: There was a deer out there (not here on the cave wall of course). He is not there now, but he was there before. 25 Now and before are different; here (the cave wall) is merely representing there (the meadow in front of the cave). This prehistoric step in the organization of our minds mattered a great deal. 5 In making such distinctions, (4) we are implicitly forming categories, something that is often す overlooked The formation of categories in humans is guided by a cognitive principle of wanting 多くの何報をできる! 325 h to encode as much information as possible with the least possible effort. Categorization systems optimize* the ease of conception and the importance of being able to communicate about those hibernate 冬眠する sensory receptor: 感覚受容器 (体の周囲の環境情報を感知する受容器の総称。 目、鼻、耳など) cognitive : 認識の mental representation 的表象(例えば人が「イヌ」を考えるとき、それは頭の中で文字でも映像でも 音でもない 何らかの形で思い描かれるが,この「頭の中の記号」のことを心的表象という) encode:・・・を記号化する optimize ... を最大限にする permeate : ･･･ に広がる 英 6 音

𐙚 中学生 英語 ( Some reseachers say that a large area of mangroves was lost ) to create shrimp farms between 2000 and 2010 . という英文の文法の解説おねがいし... 続きを読む

C 力をつけよう (本誌 p.57) 解答 レベル 2 150語 次の英文を読んで、あとの問いに答えなさい。 中学生の優真(Yuma)は英語の授業で環境について調べ、マングローブ (mangroves) について発表しています。 Mangroves are a group of tropical plants. They grow at the マングローブは熱帯性の植物の一種です。 interface of land and sea. The shapes of their roots are strange, します。 陸と海の境界面に生育 マングローブの特徴や 根の形は奇妙で、 人々は水面上または陸上でも 環境にとって重要な理 and people can see them above water or on land for some time 一日のうち何時間かはそれらを見ることができます。 of the day. (1) ( ① )the water level of the sea is high, their 海の水位が高いとき、 マングローブの根は水中にあります。 roots are in the water. Mangroves can live in salty water, but マングローブは塩水でも生息できますが、他の植 other plants usually can't. 物は通常生息できません。 由について読み取りま しょう。 Mangroves are very important to the environment for several reasons. ②例えば, マングローブは、いくつかの理由から環境にとって非常に重要です。 they are the homes for many kinds of fish. They protect humans, plants, and 多くの種類の魚の生息地になっています。 their=マングロー ブ 例えば、 they=マングロー ブ 洪水や強風から陸上の人間、 植物、動物を守っ animals on land from floods or strong winds. They can also improve water quality. 水質を改善することもできます。 てくれます。 が失われたと言っています。 ③ [ say/lost/ large area / that / was / some researchers / a / of mangroves ] to create 一部の研究者は、2000年から2010年の間に、エビの養殖場を作るためにマングロ ブ林の広大な地域 shrimp farms between 2000 and 2010. To conserve them many young people took action. それらを保護するために、 多くの若者が行動を起こしました。 One of ④these people is a 24-year-old woman. She was born on June 5th, World Environment その1人が24歳の女性です。 ●彼女は6月5日の世界環境デーに生まれたので、彼女 Day, so her mother often said to her, “Do something good for the environment." の母親はよく彼女に「環境のために何かいいことをしなさい」と言っていました。 (注)tropical: 熱帯性の interface : 境界面 land: 陸地 root(s): 根 strange : 奇妙な above 〜の上に water level : 水位 home(s): 生息地 human(s): 人間 flood(s) : 洪水 shrimp farm (s) : エビの養殖場 conserve: 保護する 24-year-old: 24歳の World Environment Day: 世界環境デー them=マングロー ブ She, her= (世界 環境デーの6/5に 生まれた) 24歳の 女性

1.はわかったのですが2.からは全くです空欄の数にあいません。誰が教えていただけますか？🙇💦

誤文訂正の問題で解答に解説が付いていないので丸をつけているところの解説をしていただきたいです🙇🏻‍♀️二重線引いているところが答えです

3. 44 次の1~5の英文には誤っている箇所が1つずつある。 ア~エから選び、記号で答えなさい。 1(大)) 2( ) 4( ) 5( too much fast food if he ウ (2) They surprised how エ ) wants to be healthy. young she looked when they ウ ) 3 ( 1 He must not eats ア イ イ 3 I want this dress because ア 4 ウ 4 I hear ア イ that Hirota Shrine is oldest ウ 5 How much water are ア there イ it's color makes me iPod I エ in Hyogo. エ first met her. feel happy. I in the bottle? 'nob no jadr ( 仁川学院高) 5 次の英文の(ア)~(エ)から文法的な誤りがあるものを1つ選び, 記号で答えなさい。 (関西大学北陽高) 1. He (ア) plays rugby as (イ) Well than his brother does.(ami) (エ) 2. My mother (ア) gave me (ウ) (イ) many money today, so I (ウ) can go to see a ・(エ) tody abom bloode food movie with you. (ア) (イ) 4. His mother (ア) likes (5.) Jessica (ア) Worked (イ) (イ) hard (ウ) (エ) the picture (ウ) 3.He doesn't has to clean his classroom every Monday. ( which I (エ) painted it for her. ( (ウ) from morning (x) by night this week. ( ) ) 6 次の(1)~(5)の英文の下線部には誤りの箇所がそれぞれ1つずつあります。 その箇所を(ア)~(エ)の記 号で選び、訂正して答えなさい。 )(2)( ()(3)( (金光八尾高) ( ) (4) () ( )(5)( )( ) with my homework. Who was the girl (1) spoken (2) in (1) by at the party? (イ) (エ) (1)( ( (1) (ア) (2) Few of them (y) were kind enough (1) helping (") me (3) Ben is the children. (4) I am one doesn't like who (ウ) (エ) what (イ) (ウ) kind of work (エ) he is doing. (ウ) (ア) Youngest (イ) in my (ア) of the few people (イ) (5) I don't know where is he and (ア) uncle's five (エ) to read stories.

(1)なぜ、goではなくgetになるのですか？

次の会話において,( )内に示されていることを伝える場合,どのように言えばよいか。 (1),(2)の の中に, 適切な英語を補いなさい。 A: Excuse me. (1) (図書館まではどうやって行けばいいのですか。) B: Well, can you see the post office over there? A: Oh, yes. B: Turn left at the post office. You'll see the library between a flower shop and a hospital. A: Thank you. B: (どういたしまして。) (注) post office 郵便局 (1) (2) How can I go to the library ?

問4の⑤の計算はどうすれば合うのですか。 教えてください🙇‍♀️ 3枚目が答えです。

次の英文を読んで,下の設問に答えなさい。 Last year, 4.2 million babies died. That is the most recent number reported by UNICEF of deaths before the age of one, worldwide. We often see lonely and emotionally charged numbers like this in the news or in the materials of activist groups or organizations. They produce a reaction. Who can even imagine 4.2 million dead babies? It is so terrible, and even worse when we know that almost all died from easily preventable diseases. And how can anyone argue that 4.2 million is anything other than a huge number? You might think that nobody would even try to argue (that, but you would be wrong. That is exactly why I mentioned this number. Because it is not huge: it is beautifully small. If we even start to think about how tragic each of these deaths is for the parents who had waited for their newborn to smile, and walk, and play, and instead had to bury their baby, then this number could keep us crying for a long time. But who would be helped by these tears? Instead let's think clearly about human suffering. The number 4.2 million is for 2016. The year before, the number was 4.4 million. The year before that, it was 4.5 million. Back in 1950, it was 14.4 million. That's almost 10 million more dead babies per year, compared with today. Suddenly this terrible number starts to look smaller. In fact (2)the number has never been lower. Of course, I am the first person to wish the number was even lower and falling even faster. But to know how to act, and how to prioritize resources, nothing can be more important than doing the cool-headed math and realizing what works and what doesn't. And this is clear: more and more deaths are being prevented. comparing the numbers. (3). We would never realize that without