学年

質問の種類

英語 高校生

英検準一級の要約問題です。 添削していただけないでしょうか?🙇‍♀️

英検公式サンプル問題 ⚫ Instructions: Read the article below and summarize it in your own words as far as possible in English. ⚫ Suggested length: 60-70 words Write your summary in the space provided on your answer sheet. Any writing outside the space will not be graded. From the 1980s to the early 2000s, many national museums in Britain were charging their visitors entrance fees. The newly elected government, however, was supportive of the arts. It introduced a landmark policy to provide financial aid to museums so that they would drop their entrance fees. As a result, entrance to many national museums, including the Natural History Museum, became free of charge. Supporters of the policy said that as it would widen access to national museums, it would have significant benefits. People, regardless of their education or income, would have the opportunity to experience the large collections of artworks in museums and learn about the country's cultural history. Although surveys indicated that visitors to national museums that became free increased by an average of 70 percent after the policy's introduction, critics claimed the policy was not completely successful. This increase, they say, mostly consisted of the same people visiting museums many times. Additionally, some independent museums with entrance fees said the policy negatively affected them. Their visitor numbers decreased because people were visiting national museums to avoid paying fees, causing the independent museums to struggle financially.

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

この黄色いマーカーのとこの分構造を教えて欲しいです。

異議をとなえる 明治大文 significant five per cent. 2022年度英語 7 chalerghg T困難だがやりがいある always prefer print to ebooks. By 2016, that number had climbed a modest but 控えぬ The increased sales books) and their popularity with of younger people, demonstrate that old media is not just the province the old)/ 領域 3 The argument that printed books were becoming outdated and obsolete was by challenged not only by books' renewed popularity, but also by expert studies that pointed out the psychological Benefits enjoyed by people (who liked to read 動 a remedy for (イ) b.difficult writing) (in other words researchers suggested reading ( n all sorts of problems) (2013) the journal Science published a study that concluded that people who mostly read literary writing had a clearer appreciation breached other people's ways of thinking than those who tended to prefer popular bestsellers: The authors (②this study) discovered readers to be better (あ the emotions expressed faces on at understanding others' false beliefs when they had just read prizewinning short stories than when they had I read lighter more commercial writing: This experiment provided a new contribution to the familiar debate (on the difference between literary writing and popular bestsellers Bluzin 1 0 experiment suggested b/captivated (②E a printed book) remained a worthwhile (even in the digital age that finding time to be activity (C① many people) O 4 est The view that people the past read more were better readers is not ✓ and (historical evidence. It is true that print experienced a golden age between the rise D mass audiences: ( the eighteenth century (and the twentieth- a century triumph of the paperback Nonetheless, well before competition (from social media, only a finy minority (①volumes that were published ever found a ader(1 Instead of reading novels carefully, aristocrats had their hair curled reader ✓ ever while listening to a servant reading aloud Long before people compiled favorite songs or pieces of music on their computer or mobile phone, poetry lovers scissored pages apart to paste scraps of one collection onto the margins of another. Early bookstores sold fish, while books were also sold door-to-door by clothing salesmen. Authors back then debated in print, as strongly as today's content providers do online, whether the written work should be rented or sold, licensed or owned. In short, printed books gave birth to many of the capacities cs CamScanner でスキャン

解決済み 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

(221)についての質問です。 どうしてwhichの直後にsurprisedが来ているのでしょうか。 made everyone surprisedかis surprising by everyoneとかになるかと思いました。 どなたか文の構造を教えていただきたいです🙇‍♀️

としたが、それは不可能だった。 わたが,それにはみんなが驚いた [←そのことはみ 旅行できる日を楽しみにしています。 ットの練習ができる部屋がほしい。 みたい理由を教えてください。 肌に合って b)句や節の内容を受ける which I tried to catch up with Takumi, which was impossible. [旬] 220 Yuka quit the club suddenly, which surprised everyone. [節] 221 220 私はタクミに追いつこうとしたが, それは不可能だった。 221 ユカは突然クラブをやめたが,それにはみんなが驚いた [←そのことはみんなを驚かせた] 。 非制限用法の which は,名詞だけでなく句や節の内容を先行詞にすることがあ る。220 では, to catch up with Takumi (タクミに追いつくこと)という句を 221 では Yuka quit the club suddenly (ユカが突然クラブをやめた)という節 (前の文全体) が先行詞になり, which 以下がそれを補足説明している。 Shelly says she is sick, which is not true. [節] (前の文の一部) (シェリーは気分が悪いと言っているが, それは本当ではない。) - なお,この用法は, 話し言葉でもよく使われる。 Tips for Expression! 17 非制限用法を使う場合 関係代名詞の制限用法は, 先行詞を絞りこむ (=制限する) 働きをする。 次の文で 複数いる医者の中から「父の命を救ってくれた医者」に絞り込んで特定している。 I admire the doctor who saved my father's life. (私は父の命を救ってくれた医者を尊敬しています。) これに対し, Dr. Yamanaka Shinya のような固有名詞は絞り込むことができ いので、 非制限用法しか使えない。 ■I admire Dr. Yamanaka Shinya, who won the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 2012. (私は山中伸弥博士を尊敬してい ます。 彼は2012年にノーベル生理学・医学賞を受賞しました。) 文で who を制限用法にすると、 「山中伸弥博士」が複数人いること しまう。 一,次の文では,先行詞 this movie は1つに限定されるので

解決済み 回答数: 2