【至急】 (1)はどういう意味で使われていますか？

Today's food world is a mixed up world. We may associate coffee with Brazil, cocoa with Ghana and potatoes with Ireland, but that is because these crops have been shifted around the world from their (1)native habitat. The story of food is the history of how different people have wandered the world, conquered it, mixed it up and controlled it for their own benefit. 5 (2)How has the relationship which humans have had with food changed over the hundreds of thousands of years of their existence? 9dd To egy qa et dedd b1ow V19v9 buB onob ai daria noidos ((青山学院大 85 words) 語句:mixed up: ごちゃまぜの associate A with B: AでBを連想する shift: 移動させる en wander: 歩き回る conquer: 征服する hundreds of thousands of: 何十万の otaum deeda 問1 下線部(1)のnative habitatはどういう意味で使われているか, 日本語で答えなさい。 問2 下線部(2)を日本語にしなさい。 9 abecrs pAbe oeseL bexjoLDace gu iw htr IeraiV

赤線のとこの翻訳お願いします。

翻訳 - 東語 Speculations about the origins of Soy lla oe of the I2 Speculations おをらくこの場合は、雑論。震測 Origin Scy lla One nの上の) 点 スキュラ、ギリシク神話の犬の子」女王 on of the …. notの) むtaris recently released to their natural. their . 彼らの habitats 生息犯 最近 リリースされた タイトルの復数 recently released habitats て。 10 titaris スキュラの原点。17は最近彼らの自然にリタースされス 15

この英語の並べ替え問題を教えてください。 海洋哺乳類はどこに生息しているかということで生息地の喪失の危険にとりわけ晒されている。 Marine mammals are ( because / habitat / loss / of / of / particular / ... 続きを読む

和訳お願いします‼️

Why are the gorillas in the Congo endangered? Some gorillas are also on the Red List. According to a study, the largest gorillas in the Congo may die out soon. There are many reasons, such as hunting, logging, and mining. Surprisingly, our electronic devices are one of these reasons. To make these devices, we need some special metals. Some of these metals come from the gorillas' habitat. If we use more devices, more of their habitat may be destroyed. These gorillas may not survive. We have to understand this. Why do we have to protect these animals? Each animal has its own role in the ecosystem. If we lose one species, it affects many others. Human beings are also part of this ecosystem. We are all related to each other. So it is important for us to take action now. Let's help the animals survive. 10 15 [137 words)

英語に自信がある人回答づくりお願いします！ ※書き込みは気にしないでください。 これプラス、問題に続きがあって、 問5 本文には、実物の動物を見ることによって人々がより深く理解できることが3つ書かれています。それらを日本語で答えなさい。 問6 本文には、動物園... 続きを読む

第4問 次の英文を読んで、 設問に答えなさい。①~6は段落番号です。 黒体 6) のIn my view, (1)it_is perfectly possible for many species of animals living in gon.. ie parks to have a quality of life as high as, or higher than, in the wild. 'Animals in ood z0os get a varied and high-quality diet with all the supplements required. and anv 1pesses they might have will be treated.Their movement might be somewhat restricted. mt they have a safe environment in which to live, and they are spared bullying and social 神年 predators*2 or the irritation and pain of parasites or injuries. The average captive animal racism*1 by others of their kind. They do not suffer from the threat or stress of will have a greater life expectancy compared with its wild counterpart, and will not die of drought, of starvation or in the jaws of a predator. Alot of very nasty things happen to truly wild' animals that simply don't happen in good zoos, and to view a life that is 'free' as 術保者一 one that is automatically ‘good' is, I think, an error. Furthermore, zoos serve several key purposes. の Firstly, zoos aid conservation. Colossal numbers of species are becoming extinct across the world, and many more are increasingly threatened and therefore risk extinction. Moreover, some of these collapses have been sudden, dramatic and unexpected, or were simply discovered very late in the day. Aspecies protected in captivity can be bred up to provide a reservoir*3 population against a population crash or extinction in the wild. A good number of species only exist in captivity, with many ofthese livinginzoos. Stillmore only exist in the wildbecause they have been reintroduced from zoos, or have wild populations that have been1o0osted by captive bred animals Without (2these efforts there would be fewer species alive today. Although reintroduction successes are few and far between*4, the numbers are increasing, and the very fact that species have been saved or reintroduced as a result of captive breeding proves the value of such initiatives. ③ Zoos alsoprovide education. Many children and adults, especially those in cities, will never see a wild animal beyond a fox or pigeon. While it is true that television documentaries are becoming ever more detailed and impressive, and many natural history specimens are on display in museums, there really is nothing to compare with seeinga living creature in the flesh*5, hearing it, smelling it, watching what it does and having the time to absorb details. That alone will bring a greater understanding and perspective to many, and hopefully give them a greater appreciation for wildlife, conservation efforts and how they can contribute. ④ Inaddition to this, there isalsothe education that cantake place in Z0Osthrough signs, talks and presentations which directly communicate information to visitors about the animals they are seeing and their place in the world. This was an area where zoos used to be lacking, but they are now increasingly sophisticated in their communication and 8.

英語に自信がある人回答づくりお願いします！ ※書き込みは気にしないでください。 これプラス、問題に続きがあって、 問5 本文には、実物の動物を見ることによって人々がより深く理解できることが3つ書かれています。それらを日本語で答えなさい。 問6 本文には、動物園... 続きを読む

第4問 次の英文を読んで、 設問に答えなさい。①~6は段落番号です。 黒体 6) のIn my view, (1)it_is perfectly possible for many species of animals living in gon.. ie parks to have a quality of life as high as, or higher than, in the wild. 'Animals in ood z0os get a varied and high-quality diet with all the supplements required. and anv 1pesses they might have will be treated.Their movement might be somewhat restricted. mt they have a safe environment in which to live, and they are spared bullying and social 神年 predators*2 or the irritation and pain of parasites or injuries. The average captive animal racism*1 by others of their kind. They do not suffer from the threat or stress of will have a greater life expectancy compared with its wild counterpart, and will not die of drought, of starvation or in the jaws of a predator. Alot of very nasty things happen to truly wild' animals that simply don't happen in good zoos, and to view a life that is 'free' as 術保者一 one that is automatically ‘good' is, I think, an error. Furthermore, zoos serve several key purposes. の Firstly, zoos aid conservation. Colossal numbers of species are becoming extinct across the world, and many more are increasingly threatened and therefore risk extinction. Moreover, some of these collapses have been sudden, dramatic and unexpected, or were simply discovered very late in the day. Aspecies protected in captivity can be bred up to provide a reservoir*3 population against a population crash or extinction in the wild. A good number of species only exist in captivity, with many ofthese livinginzoos. Stillmore only exist in the wildbecause they have been reintroduced from zoos, or have wild populations that have been1o0osted by captive bred animals Without (2these efforts there would be fewer species alive today. Although reintroduction successes are few and far between*4, the numbers are increasing, and the very fact that species have been saved or reintroduced as a result of captive breeding proves the value of such initiatives. ③ Zoos alsoprovide education. Many children and adults, especially those in cities, will never see a wild animal beyond a fox or pigeon. While it is true that television documentaries are becoming ever more detailed and impressive, and many natural history specimens are on display in museums, there really is nothing to compare with seeinga living creature in the flesh*5, hearing it, smelling it, watching what it does and having the time to absorb details. That alone will bring a greater understanding and perspective to many, and hopefully give them a greater appreciation for wildlife, conservation efforts and how they can contribute. ④ Inaddition to this, there isalsothe education that cantake place in Z0Osthrough signs, talks and presentations which directly communicate information to visitors about the animals they are seeing and their place in the world. This was an area where zoos used to be lacking, but they are now increasingly sophisticated in their communication and 8.

英語に自信がある人回答づくりお願いします！ ※書き込みは気にしないでください。 これプラス、問題に続きがあって、 問5 本文には、実物の動物を見ることによって人々がより深く理解できることが3つ書かれています。それらを日本語で答えなさい。 問6 本文には、動物園... 続きを読む

第4問 次の英文を読んで、 設問に答えなさい。①~6は段落番号です。 黒体 6) のIn my view, (1)it_is perfectly possible for many species of animals living in gon.. ie parks to have a quality of life as high as, or higher than, in the wild. 'Animals in ood z0os get a varied and high-quality diet with all the supplements required. and anv 1pesses they might have will be treated.Their movement might be somewhat restricted. mt they have a safe environment in which to live, and they are spared bullying and social 神年 predators*2 or the irritation and pain of parasites or injuries. The average captive animal racism*1 by others of their kind. They do not suffer from the threat or stress of will have a greater life expectancy compared with its wild counterpart, and will not die of drought, of starvation or in the jaws of a predator. Alot of very nasty things happen to truly wild' animals that simply don't happen in good zoos, and to view a life that is 'free' as 術保者一 one that is automatically ‘good' is, I think, an error. Furthermore, zoos serve several key purposes. の Firstly, zoos aid conservation. Colossal numbers of species are becoming extinct across the world, and many more are increasingly threatened and therefore risk extinction. Moreover, some of these collapses have been sudden, dramatic and unexpected, or were simply discovered very late in the day. Aspecies protected in captivity can be bred up to provide a reservoir*3 population against a population crash or extinction in the wild. A good number of species only exist in captivity, with many ofthese livinginzoos. Stillmore only exist in the wildbecause they have been reintroduced from zoos, or have wild populations that have been1o0osted by captive bred animals Without (2these efforts there would be fewer species alive today. Although reintroduction successes are few and far between*4, the numbers are increasing, and the very fact that species have been saved or reintroduced as a result of captive breeding proves the value of such initiatives. ③ Zoos alsoprovide education. Many children and adults, especially those in cities, will never see a wild animal beyond a fox or pigeon. While it is true that television documentaries are becoming ever more detailed and impressive, and many natural history specimens are on display in museums, there really is nothing to compare with seeinga living creature in the flesh*5, hearing it, smelling it, watching what it does and having the time to absorb details. That alone will bring a greater understanding and perspective to many, and hopefully give them a greater appreciation for wildlife, conservation efforts and how they can contribute. ④ Inaddition to this, there isalsothe education that cantake place in Z0Osthrough signs, talks and presentations which directly communicate information to visitors about the animals they are seeing and their place in the world. This was an area where zoos used to be lacking, but they are now increasingly sophisticated in their communication and 8.

ここのthat節は同格でdoubtにかかってる　であってますか？

account of long exposure to the sun and wind. Now we are also faced by other environmental problems, such as ar pollution. の@ It is only too clear that human activities are responsible for these phenomena. It iS our duty to make every possible effort to protect the global environment. The human race has availed itself of the Sviomd and destroyed it on a large scale. ⑨ There is no doubt that environmental destruction is a matter of Hife and death for all creatures on the ei Therefore, we can*t be too careful in avoiding development that interferes with the balance of ecosystems. (注) habitat 「生息地, 自生地] overgrazing 「過徐放牧」 Ste7or

分構造について教えて頂けないでしょうか？🙇‍♂️🙇‍♂️🙇‍♂️ They are among vulnerable species that ecologists say may disappear altogether within the next decade. ... 続きを読む

] ' What do Chinese alligators, black rhinos, and Sumatran orangutans 0 境 Environment @ sow27 吾 Some animal species likely to be extinct in ten years jesimieommomz They are among Vulnerablesspeces that ccologists say may disappear altogether within the next decade. The main reason their numbers are diminishing so rapidly is human activity。 such as logging, construction, and hunting. The World Wildlife Fund estimates there are only about 7,500 Sumatran orangutans remaining in the wild. There are even fewer black rhinos, and the number of Chinese alligators is only 150 to 200. Scientists say we must make a determined effort to prevent the total loss of these wnique species、 Although these animals may seem exotic, they represent the urgent world ecological crisis that affects all wildlife. We must appeal to governments to get serious about preserving habitats and punishing poachers 一before its too late. (Original 130 words) EE ia @ natural1-1 販則 いくつかの動物種が 10 年後に絶減する可能性 ⑩ ヨウゥスコウワニ. クロサイ,. そしてスマトラオランウータンの共通点は何だ ろうか。 これらの動物は, 今後10年のうちに完全に消滅してしまうかもしれな いと生態学者が言う 危急種の中に含まれている。その個体数がこれほどまでに 急激に減少している主な理由は, 例えば木の伐採や建設工事, それに狩猟といっ た人間の活動である。世界自然保護基金の推定によると, 野生に残っているスマ トラオランウータンは, およそ7500 頭しかいないという。クロサイはさらに少 なく, ヨウスコウリワニの個体数はわずか 150 200 頭にすぎない。私たちはこれ らの希少な種がすべて失われることを防ぐために, 断固たる努力をしなければな らない., と科学者たちは主張する。これらの動物たちは珍しいものに思えるかも しれないが, すべての野生動物に影響を与える差し迫った世界的な生明系の危機 を象徴している。 手遅れになる 私たちは政府に対して, 生息環境を保護し たり審猟者らを処罰したりすることについて真剣に考えるよう, 訴えなければな らない。 上

長文中の空所（10）に入れるのに最も適当な文を選択する問題です。答えはdなのですが、解説を読んでもなぜdになるのかあまりよく分かりませんでした。なぜdが正解でなぜ他の選択肢は間違いなのか教えていただきたいです。 3つ目の画像は赤本の解説です。よろしくお願いします。

fossil known 4S “Lucy,” 4zsが6272の27がecz4S の27e2S7s from 3.2 mmillion years ago Thcsc MRDSHIR. Lucy was a 1ot jike a impenzeeGc (hat shc Co計時ISHII Sightly bigger brain. Her skin was not preserved, but _She Was probably covered with far. However, between two and three millions years ago Our_ancestors began to inhabit more open savannahs meant the 1 e oO 8 y were out 后 fe sum ーー) 『 glaring heat for many more hours each day. Around the same time, they also started to hunt and eat more meat and game animals were more abundant in the open. This move into open Spaces offered an explanation for our lack of hair. Im the 1990s, Peter Wheeler of Liverpool John Moores University im the UK came up with a mathematical model showing how much excess heat ⑧ hominins would need to lose in open habitats in order to function。 HE their brains got too hot their thought processes would 0 PA If the hominins were covered in hair, they could not have lost heat fast enough. Wheeler reasoned that ( 10 ) allowed our ancestors to keep cool. One was an upright gait. Walking on two legs meant that only the tops of their bodies were under direct sunlight. But the hominins also started running long distances. This meant they ould bring down large garme animals by running them to exhaustion, but