学年

質問の種類

現代文 高校生

【至急】 現代文全然わからないので答えて欲しいです! ⑴傍線部①とあるがこのようにいうのは何故か。 六十字以上七十字以内で述べよ。 ⑵傍線部②とはどういうことか。 八十字以上九十字以内で述べよ。 ⑶傍線部③について、筆者の「ネーションへの帰属」に対する考えを百字以上百... 続きを読む

Rアや Sト す。この漠然とした読解を改善しなくては、現代文で安定した点奏をりる 身につけていきましょう。 (ナショナリズムとは何であろうか? またネーションとは何だろうか?ナショナリズムは、近代的な現象である。歴史家たちは、こ のことをよく認識している。ネーションやナショナリズムの始発点を近代のどの時期に求めるべきかについては、後に議論しよう。それ が厳密にはどの時期であるにせよ、ネーションという共同体が、古代にすでにスタートしていたという、ナショナリストたちがしばしば 抱く主観的な思い込みは、明らかに客観的な事実に反している。 ベネディクト·アンダーソンは、近代的な現象としてのナショナリズムのあり方を直感するためには、「無名戦士の墓と碑」のことを思 N ってみればよい、と勧めている。れらの墓は、徹底して匿名的であるか、あるいは空虚である。これらの墓にだれが葬られているか、 だれも特定することはできない。ときには、墓が、意図的に空である場合すらある。このようにだれかの死を記憶するための建造物が、 始めからまったく匿名的であり、実質的には空虚であることなど、かつてはなかったことである。つまり、これは、純粋に近代的な現象 なのである。かつても、遺骸の納められていない墓というものが稀にはあった。たとえば、古代ギリシャでは、何らかの事情によって遺 骸を通常のしかたで埋葬できない人のための空の墓があったし、エジプトのファラオの墓が、どういう理由によるのか、意図的に空にな っている場合がある。心かし>でれちは、社会のなかの特別なーしたがって名のある||人物のものであり、少なくとも同時代の人々 にとっては、どの個人のためのものか特定できたはずだ。しかし>社会の一般の、しかもこれほど大量の人々の墓が、時間の流れのなか で生ずる忘却の不可抗なはたらきによらずして、最初から匿名的なものとして設置されたことなど、かつてなかった。しかも』墓碑の公 共的·儀礼的な価値は、ひとえにこの匿名性に依存しているのである。アンダーソンの指示に従って、だれかどこかのひま人が、無名戦 士の名前を発見したとか、記念碑に本物の骨を入れようと言い出したと想像してみよう。Oこれは、奇妙な見当はずれの、冒漬的ですら ある提案に聞こえてくる。これらの墓は、明らかに空であるにもかかわらず、ある感情的な色彩をともなった国民的想像力を鼓舞する。 nJV まるで、この墓が記念する人々は不在であることを条件にしてこそ、まさにそこの住民であるかのようだ

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

見づらいですが小さい点が選択した答えです。間違っているところ教えてください。

カッコに入る適を選びなさい 1. We are encouraged to attend the workshop ( ) how to deal with difficult customers 1.. learn 2. learns to learn 4. to learning 2. Lenard didn't have a chance ( ) golf during his vacation. 1. play 2. to ply 3. to playing 4.. playing 3. Please do not hesitate( )me if you need further information. 1. contact 2. contacting to contact 4. Contacted 4. We need to finish ( ) the budget plan by the end of the week. 2.. making 1. make 3. to make 4. made 5. Ms. Coleman is in charge of ( )the brochure featuring our new line of furniture. 1. edit 2.. editing 3. being edited 4. edited 6.() the shipment status of your order, please visit our web site 2.. To check 1. Check 3. Checked 4. To be checked 7. When you send your file, please be sure ( ) it is enclosed. 1. confirm confirming 3. to confirm 4. confirmed 8.()things online is quick and easy, as well as cheaper. 2.. Buying 1. Buy 3. To buying 4. To bought 9.We are looking forward ( ) with you in the near future. 2. working 1. work 3. to work to working 10. We had discussed for hours but Mr. Nash avoided ( ) on a roadmap for the new project 1. agree 2.. agreeing 3. to agree 4. to agreeing 11. Don't forget ( ) him about the matter 2. telling 1. tell 3.. to tell 4. to telling 12.1 decided ( ) you soon. to meet 2. to meeting 3. meeting 4. meet 13. Would you mind ( )me your name and address? 2.. telling 1. tell 3. to tell 4. to telling 14. Mr Hunter gave up ()a new car 1. buy 2.. buying 3. to buy 4. to buying 15. He refused ( ) the boy any money. 2.. gving 1.gve 3. to give 4。 to giving 「提出」 ボタンを押してください。

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

至急お願いします🙇🏻‍♀️🙇🏻‍♀️

|2 次の文章は,日本文にあった「法」と「道徳」に関するものです。 読んだうえで設問に答え なさい。 When we think about the reach of the law, the first question is whether we have good reason to accept that the law has any proper authority | (ア)|all. (A) Why should we obey it? To a certain extent, the answer is implicit in the analysis of the “nature of law" question. (B) If law is held to be morally authoritative by definition, it will seem that an obligation to obey flows simply from the recognition of law as law. If the definition of law excludes this moral authority, the source of obligation must be sought elsewhere. The question about authority, however, is not as straightforward as this. What we are asking about is the kind of connection to be found (イ)| the authority of rulers to lay down laws and the legal and moral duty of the ruled to obey them. It is often asserted that there seems to be a general duty of obligation to obey the law. What (c) this means is that in the absence of special reasons which might justify a specific exemption, the acceptance of the duty of obedience presupposes the acknowledgement of the law's authority. (D) How it might lead to this, however, is a matter for debate. It may be for reasons quite independent (ウ)| the authoritative status of the law. The special reasons for suspending this presumption, furthermore, suggesting that there are limits to the general duty, must arise from considerations powerful enough to take priority over the standard reasons for obedience. 【設問】 (ウ) ずつ選びなさい。 I. (ア) に入る最も適当な語を, (a)~ (f)の中からそれぞれ1つ (イ) (ア)= ( へ (イ=( (ウ)= ( へ (a) of (b) on (c) of (d)from (e) at (f) between I. 下線部(C)の内容を日本語で簡潔に説明しなさい。 2

未解決 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

佐賀大学(平成31年度)の大門3の要約問題について質問です。 添削お願いします。

3 次の英文を読んで、その要旨を300字程度の日本語で書きなさい。句読点も字数に 含めるものとする。(30点) Learning to interpret what others mean is complex. Because we learn early to interpret meanings by the form of expression a person uses, there is much room for misunderstanding. This may lead us to make value judgments and become convinced that a speaker is insincere, dishonest, or disrespectful when we misread the intentions or the significance of a message within a social setting. One example of the need to use and understand socially appropriate messages is in the determination of when a speaker has said no. In many languages and societies, people usually don't say no directly. Instead, they have less direct ways of expressing refusal. The nonnative speaker needs to recognize the ways in which this is done. For example, in Hispanic cultures it is considered inappropriate for servants to say no directly to their employers. Instead, the social norm requires the servant to reply to a request from an employer with the form manana. Although a literal translation of manana is “tomorrow," the most frequently intended meaning for it in this situation is simply “no." But, this is a polite no, since the request has not been refused directly, just postponed. A nonnative employer will wait a long time for service if he or she relies on the literal meaning of the word manana. Still another example of misinterpretation has to do with who may initiate a conversation. In some Asian languages, such as Chinese, Japanese, or Korean, children do not usually initiate conversations with adults and do not speak unless spoken to. In contrast, American children are free, and even encouraged, to initiate conversations with adults. Similarly, whenever there is a perceived difference in status for example, between student and teacher-the inferior usually does not

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

難しくてよく分からないです。 答えと根拠を教えてください。

人eg 7Zs pgssgge gzの gpsyer 万e 9zes77o725 のe/の必 Im nearly all established democracies, television has become the preeminent mass medium Television is a visual, credible and easily digested format which reaches almost every househod. providing the main source of political information. Im election campaigns。for instance, the teleyision studio has become the main site of batde. The candidates participate through appearing on interviews, debates and talk show: merely appearing on television confers some status and recognition on them. Of course, the political significance of television goes far beyond elections. Huge numbers of ordinary voters watch the evening news and it is here,( A ),that television has most infuence. Through their assumptions about newsworthiness, editors resolve their daily problem of reducing a day's worth of world events to ( 1 ) than 30 minutes on the evening news. Because news programs focus on the exceptional, often negative, their content is always an unrepresentative sample of events. For example, policy failures receive ( 2 ) attenton than policy successes. Similarly, corruption is a story but integrity is not. Necessarily。 television is a distorting mirror on the world. The more Compressed news coverage becomes,the ( 3 ) accurate the 征V lens is bound to be. Despite the primacy of television it would be wrong to discount the political significance of the second mass medium, newWspapers. Today, Television tells us what h in context.

回答募集中 回答数: 0