学年

質問の種類

英語 高校生

写真の文についてわからないことが2つあります。 ①avarage outは「〜を平均化する」という意味でしょうか?(調べても複数の意味があったのでわからないです) ②こちらがメインなのですが、、A of Bを素直に訳すと「BのA」という訳になりますが、黄線部は日本語訳を見る... 続きを読む

Enozzol 4 Certain ancient Greek philosophers, (including Pythagoras), believed that S 0'2 01- beauty was based on symmetry and regularity), and they were convinced that mathematics was at the core of true beauty). This concept (therefore) く、 0 convince 人 that S'V' の受動態 <this + 名詞 → まとめ表現 was discovered (when they noticed that objects [which matched the golden more attractive (than objects [that were more random S V- (s) V ratio] appeared to be (c)] in shape]))). ³Symmetry and regularity (also) seem to play a part (in physical beauty). 4 (At the end of the 19th century), British anthropologist Francis Galton 固有名詞具体例 discovered that "averaging" out human faces (by mixing them) (to form one image) achieved a level of regularity [that was more attractive than each of the individual components]). OCUPLE 訳 ピタゴラスなど一部の古代ギリシャの哲学者たちは,美は対称性と規則性に基づ くと考え, したがって, 数学が真の美の中核を成すと確信していた。この考え方が発見さ れたのは、黄金比に一致する物は、形が不規則な物よりも魅力的に見えることに彼らが気 づいたときのことだった。 対称性と規則性はまた、身体的な美においても一役を担ってい るようである。19世紀末、イギリスの人類学者フランシス・ゴルトンは、人間の顔をミ ックスして 「平均化」し、1つの像を形成すると、個々の構成要素よりも魅力的なレベル の規則性が達成されることを発見した。 句 1 /b

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

赤丸をつけたところが分かりません。ちなみに、【】は副詞句・副詞節、()は形容詞句・形容詞節、〈〉は名詞句・名詞節です。 1つ目の赤マルは、なぜthat以下が副詞節なのか(自分は名詞節だと思った) 2つ目はの赤マルは、何のofか

[At the turn of the twentieth century, a remarkable horse (named Hans) was paraded [through Germany] [by his owner Wilhelm von S M Osten, a horse trainer and high-school mathematics teacher. Not only could "Clever Hans" understand complex questions (put to him 同格のカンマ 「すなわち」 V S in plain German) 構文図解 M M O 過去分詞の名詞修 [If Tuesday falls on the eighth of the month M - but he could answer them by 0 M M what date is the following Friday?" not only A but (also) B S C S tapping out the correct number] [with his hoof]. [Using this simple V M with 「~を使って」 分詞構文「~して」 M response], it appeared [that Hans could add, subtract, multiply, and S V M add, subtract, multiply, divide divide, tell the time, understand the calendar, and both read and add ~ divide, tell the time, understand the calendar, both words spell words]. Suspicious, the German board (of education) appointed S M M V Being 省略の分詞構文 a commission, (including circus trainers, veterinarians, teachers, and 0 「~を含んだ」 M circus trainers, veterinarians, teachers, psychologists psychologists), to investigate the situation. Surprisingly, they to do C M S concluded [in 1904] <that no trick was involved>. This did not satisfy V V M S O 名詞節のthat the board, and the case was passed [to psychologist Oskar Pfungst) O S V M [for experimental investigation]. [Braving both the horse's and M 名詞節のthat observer of human behavior >. M owner's notoriously bad tempers], Pfungst finally was able to 分詞構文 「~して」 S M V demonstrate <that Hans was no mathematician, but rather a fine not[no] A but (rather) B[ATTB 20 t を使っ 教育

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

問3について質問です。 当方、全くいい案が浮かばなかったのですが、皆さんがこのような英作文に当たったらどう対処しますか❓ 具体例としてはニホンカワウソやツシマヤマネコ、トキ、コウノトリが挙げられるようですが私はどの生き物も英語で書けません。(/ω\*) ちなみに私はホ... 続きを読む

次の英文を読み, 設問に答えなさい。 Jaguars had called the American Continents their home since the Ice Age when their ascendents crossed the Bering Land Bridge that once joined what is now Alaska and Russia. They lived in the central mountains of the southwestern United States for hundreds of years until they were almost driven to extinction in the mid- 20th century after hunters shot the last one in the 1960s. Currently, jaguars are found in 19 different countries. Several males have been observed in Arizona and New Mexico over the last 20 years, but breeding pairs have not been seen or reported north of Mexico. Natural reestablishment of them is also unlikely because of urbanization and the U.S.-Mexico border blocking jaguar migration routes. Now, after more than a 50-year absence, conservation scientists are suggesting the jaguar's return to their native environment in a study that outlines what the rewilding effort may look like. The authors of the new paper suggest a suitable area for jaguars spanning 2 million acres from central Arizona to New Mexico. The space would provide a big enough range for 90 to 150 jaguars, the researchers explained. They also argued that bringing jaguars back to the U.S. is crucial to species conservation as they are listed as near-threatened on the IUCN Red List, and reintroduction could also help restore native ecosystems, the Associated Press reports. "The jaguar lived in these mountains long before Americans did. If done

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

全文訳お願いします!

4 20 科学 420 words Chapter 1 The recipe for making any creature is written in its DNA. So last year, when 1-1 geneticists* published the near-complete DNA sequence of the long-extinct woolly mammoth, there was much speculation about whether we could bring this giant creature back to life. 5 東京理科大学 Creating a living, breathing creature from a genome* sequence that exists only in a computer's memory is not possible right now. But someone someday is sure to try it, predicts Stephan Schuster, a molecular biologist at Pennsylvania State University and a driving force behind the mammoth genome project. So besides the mammoth, what other extinct beasts might we bring back to life? Well, 12 10 it is only going to be possible with creatures for which we can recover a complete genome Without one, there is no chance. And usually when a creature dies, the (1) - DNA in any flesh left untouched is soon destroyed as it is attacked by sunshine and bacteria. sequence. There are, however, some circumstances in which DNA can be preserved. If your 15 specimen froze to death in an icy wasteland such as Siberia, or died in a dark cave or a really dry region, for instance, then the probability of finding some intact stretches of DNA is much higher. Even in ideal conditions, though, no genetic information is likely to survive more than a million years. - so dinosaurs are out and only much younger remains are likely to yield good-quality DNA. "It's really only worth studying specimens that are less than 100,000 years old," says Schuster. The genomes of several extinct species besides the mammoth are already being sequenced, but turning these into living creatures will not be easy. "It's hard to say that something will never ever be possible," says Svante Pääbo of the Max Planck Institute 25 for Evolutionary Anthropology in Germany, "but it would require technologies so far removed from what we currently have that I cannot imagine how it would be done." But then (3) 50 years ago, who would have believed we would now be able to read the instructions for making humans, fix inherited diseases, clone mammals and be close to creating artificial life? Assuming that we will develop the necessary technology, we have 30 selected ten extinct creatures that might one day be resurrected. Our choice is based not just on practicality, but also on each animal's "charisma" - just how exciting the prospect of resurrecting these animals is. 1-3

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 中学生

どこを抜き出して答えればいいのか分からないので答えをお願いします🙇‍♀️もし出来れば解説もお願いします🙏

次の英文を読み、以下の問いに答えなさい。 Cow. Chicken. Grass. Which two are in the same group? Your answer depends on where you were born and raised. T fedt af gnofed For a long time, *research psychologists have had an idea that East Asians and Westerners think about the world in different ways. There was not enough scientific *evidence to support this idea until recently. In the past 15 years, however, researchers have learned a lot about different thinking styles and the cultural differences that produce them. The story begins in 1972, when *Liang-Hwang Chiu, a professor of *educational psychology at *Indiana University, tested more than 200 Chinese and 300 American children. He showed some cards to each child. Each card had pictures of three things. One card, for example, showed a cow, a chicken, and grass. Chiu asked the children to say which two things were in the same group. Most of the American children picked the chicken and cow. They explained the reason by saying that "both are animals." Most of the Chinese children, however, put the cow and grass together because "cows eat grass." solib - People didn't think Chiu's study was very important in the years after its *publication because $*psychological scientists at that time paid little attention to cultural differences. In the 1990s, however, *cross-cultural psychology became 2"hot" and Chiu's findings were paid attention to again. 3 Researchers at the University of Michigan did Chiu's study again by testing college students from China, Taiwan, and the United States. Without using pictures, the researchers gave the students with and asked them to say which two three words shampoo, hair, and conditioner, for example 20 were in the same group. The Americans were more likely than the Chinese to say that shampoo and conditioner go together because they're both hair care goods. The Chinese were more likely to say that shampoo and hair go together because "shampoo washes and cleans hair." Why do East Asians and Westerners think differently? Most researchers believe the answer can be Taplapo 77 Step A Step B Step C

回答募集中 回答数: 0