学年

質問の種類

英語 中学生

これを読んで問題を解いてください。よろしくお願いします

「クリック コンテンツ CAN-DO エネルギー問題に関する説明文を読んで、 概要を理解し, 自分の考えや意見を述べることができる。 Pre-reading What does "power" in this title mean? New Words ○ electricity [ilèktrísati] 電力 |cut [kåt] ← cut [kôt]...を切る, ・・・の供給をとめる じゅうでん charge [tfa:rdz] ・・・を充電する ✓ smartphone (s) [smártfôun(z)] スマートフォン ○ oil [5il] 石油 ○ coal [kóul] 石炭 ○ natural gas [nætfaral gés] 天然ガス ひかく ○ relatively [rélativli] 比較的 ✓ release [rilí:s] ・・・を放出する ■ dangerous [déindzaras] 危険な ✓ chemical(s) [kémikal(z)] 化学物質 health [hél0] 健康 fossil fuel(s) [fásl fjù:al(z)] 化石燃料 carbon dioxide [ka:rban daiáksaid] 二酸化炭素 ○ run out of ・・・ を使い果たす If the electricity were cut for one week, what would happen to our lives? The lights would be off. Trains コンテンツ would stop. We could not charge our smartphones. We depend on electricity to power most of our daily activities. How can we make the electricity we need for our future? 5 2 Japan uses a lot of oil, coal, and natural gas to make electricity. These resources are called “fossil fuels.” Fossil fuels have some good points. They are relatively cheap, and they can be used for many things. However, scientists say that we may run out of fossil 10 fuels in 100 years. There are other problems, too. Fossil fuels release carbon dioxide and other dangerous chemicals. They increase global warming and damage our health. [123 words] In-reading 1 What do we depend on to power our daily activities? 2 What do fossil fuels release? ●日本の一次エネルギー国内供給の割合 まいぞう ●世界のエネルギー資源の可採年数と確認可採埋蔵量 エネルギーなど 7.8 Other renewable energy, etc その他の再生可能 Natural gas 石油 51年 天然ガス 53年 石炭 153年 Oil 石油 187兆m3 39.7 天然ガス Water power 23.8 水力 3.3 1兆7,067億 バーレル Coal 石炭 25.4 資源エネルギー庁 (2016) 106 one hundred and six TIT 11,393億トン 日本原子力文化財団 (2016)

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

英検準一級の要約問題です。 添削していただけないでしょうか?🙇‍♀️

英検公式サンプル問題 ⚫ Instructions: Read the article below and summarize it in your own words as far as possible in English. ⚫ Suggested length: 60-70 words Write your summary in the space provided on your answer sheet. Any writing outside the space will not be graded. From the 1980s to the early 2000s, many national museums in Britain were charging their visitors entrance fees. The newly elected government, however, was supportive of the arts. It introduced a landmark policy to provide financial aid to museums so that they would drop their entrance fees. As a result, entrance to many national museums, including the Natural History Museum, became free of charge. Supporters of the policy said that as it would widen access to national museums, it would have significant benefits. People, regardless of their education or income, would have the opportunity to experience the large collections of artworks in museums and learn about the country's cultural history. Although surveys indicated that visitors to national museums that became free increased by an average of 70 percent after the policy's introduction, critics claimed the policy was not completely successful. This increase, they say, mostly consisted of the same people visiting museums many times. Additionally, some independent museums with entrance fees said the policy negatively affected them. Their visitor numbers decreased because people were visiting national museums to avoid paying fees, causing the independent museums to struggle financially.

回答募集中 回答数: 0