Grade

Type of questions

Science Junior High

化学 Cは硫黄と鉄粉の質量比が5:5=1:1だから鉄が余っているのではないのでしょうか? (7:4だと7の方の3つ分が)

問6Kさんは, 鉄と硫黄の反応について調べるために, 鉄粉と硫黄の質量の組み合わせを変え て,次のような実験を行った。 図1は用いた装置と加熱の様子を、 図2の点a~eは鉄粉と 硫黄の質量の組み合わせを示している。 これらの実験とその結果について,あとの各問いに 答えなさい。ただし, 鉄粉と硫黄の混合物を加熱したときは, 硫化鉄ができる反応だけが起 こるものとする。 [実験1] 次の①~⑤の順に操作を行った。 試験管A ① 図2の点a が示す質量の鉄粉と硫黄を乳 ばちに取り,よく混ぜ合わせた。 鉄粉と硫黄の 混合物 ②乳ばちから①の混合物を4.0g取り出し て試験管Aに入れ、 加熱した。 ③加熱した混合物の色が赤く変わりはじめ たところで加熱をやめ、変化の様子を観察 した。 ⑨反応が終わり, 試験管Aの温度が下がっ たところで試験管Aに磁石を近づけ磁石 に引きつけられる物質があるかを観察し た。 ⑤ 試験管Aの中身を少量取り出し, 5%の 塩酸と反応させ, 発生した気体のにおいを 調べた。 6.0 5.0 硫 4.0 質 3.0 図1 b c P 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 鉄粉の質量[g] 図2 1.0 [実験2] 鉄粉と硫黄を図2の点be が示す質量の 組み合わせにかえ, 〔実験1〕 と同様の操作 [g] 2.0 を行った。このとき,点bの質量の組み合わ せには試験管Bを用い, 同様に,点cには試 験管Cを,点には試験管Dを,点eには試 験管Eを用いた。 0

Unresolved Answers: 1
English Senior High

赤い下線のところがどういう構造になっているか分からないです、教えてくださいm(_ _)m

moving from " (1) 点) There are historians and others who would like to make a neat division between "historical facts" and "values." The trouble is that values even enter into deciding what count as facts-there is a big leap involved in 'raw data" to a judgement of fact. More important, one finds that the more complex and multi-levelled the history is, and the more important the issues it raises for today, the less it is possible to sustain a fact-value division. But this by no means implies that there has simply to be a conflict of prejudices and biases, as the data are manipulated to suit one worldview or another. What it does mean is that the self of the historian is an important factor. The historian is shaped by experiences, contexts, norms, values, and beliefs. When dealing with history, especially the sort of history that is of most significance in philosophy, that shaping is bound to be relevant. As far as possible it needs to be articulated and open to discussion. The best historians are well aware of this. They are alert to many dimensions of bias and to the endless (and therefore endlessly discussable) significance of their own horizons and presuppositions. A great deal can of course be learned from those who do not share our presuppositions. Our capacity to make wise, well-supported judgements in matters of historical fact and significance can only be formed over years of discussion with others, many of whom have very different horizons from our own. It is possible to I have a 12-year-old chess champion or mathematical or musical genius, but it is unimaginable that the world's greatest expert on Socrates could be that age. The difficulty is not just one of the time to assimilate information; it is (2)

Resolved Answers: 1